Elon Musk

Sorry meant to post
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LmvAUmvLA4

Musk also said that all verified accounts will be "manually authenticated" before the check appears on the profile.

hows he planning to do this since he fired everyone

he didn't say how long it would take

6-7 month wait time

you tweet at him and ask for verification and he runs it past catturd2

lol

NEW: Email from Elon to Twitter engineers and designers: "Anyone writing software or doing design should be on the 10th floor of SF HQ. It is intended to be dense and intense. Thanks, Elon."

— Zoë Schiffer (@ZoeSchiffer) November 29, 2022

dense and intense famously the friends of computer programming

i am dense and intense

get to the 10th floor asap

lol just go have a lan party in whatever stupid house you have Elon

It smells funny in there

https://thenerdstash.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/duct2.jpg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2mAsl03WQY

How much will it cost to get one of those awesome Herschel Walker badges? #onethread

Starting to think Elon paid 44m for Twitter NFT

“dense and intense” is also how ppl describe Elon

https://i.ibb.co/hLSfFZF/Fis-N0-Zv-VUAAAq-Bx.jpg

I doubt Buddah would think Musk is correct

underrated weird thing about that photo is the mirror behind the table just reflecting the lamp and whatnot

seems fine

Breaking news: The EU has warned Elon Musk that Twitter could be banned in Europe unless the billionaire abides by its strict rules on content moderationhttps://t.co/lbFJfnvrwb pic.twitter.com/w6r3bQmJwv

— Financial Times (@FinancialTimes) November 30, 2022

Stop being Woke, Europe!

Lol saw one of his fanboys say "WELL TWITTER IS BASED IN US SO EUROPEAN LAW DON'T MATTER".

Be amazed if he doesn't adopt that hilarious legal reasoning only to dirty delete tweet after his lawyers msg him

Are you serious?! pic.twitter.com/7QPkHXhT4E

— Eli Erlick (@EliErlick) November 30, 2022

thats bigotry against high net worth individuals

Money is speech, therefore taxes are censorship. And you can't advocate for censorship on Elon's Free Speech Bazaar.

(how does he tweet with a locked account?)

in many cases theyll unlock you once you delete the naughty tweet

you can see at the bottom there it says proceed to twitter to fix the issue with your account

ha wow weird

Good conversation. Among other things, we resolved the misunderstanding about Twitter potentially being removed from the App Store. Tim was clear that Apple never considered doing so.

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) November 30, 2022

uh, whose misunderstanding, now?

WHO is Elon musk?

In geography, My World

In reality, My Life

In history, My King

In mathematics, My Solution

In mythology, My god

In astronomy, My Universe

If I'm Blind, He's Light

If I'm Hungry, He's Food

If I'm sick, He's Medicine

For Me, He's Everything

— Wikram (@Vikram_RMFC) November 27, 2022

He's Food

lol that Tweet means nothing and Apple is not fond of conversations being made public even meaningless ones

if musk and apple do get in a fight about the 30% thing it's going to be a lot of

https://clickhole.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/dnmtn4ksijwyep0xmljk.jpg

but it will be worse than that because he'll make the points in such a divisive and ineffective way that he'll strengthen apple's position.

If I'm Hungry, He's Food

Toast?

https://www.saturdayeveningpost.com/2018/03/cook-muskrat-wild-dishes-1938/

wow ^

I didn't actually read that at all, hope that wasn't a mistake...

I don't know the ins and outs of the severance agreements, but this is a good letter.

So here's the thing. You can only violate people's legal rights and your own word so far before they lawyer up and come after you.

I really do hope Musk changes his mind and does the right thing - the employees deserve that. But it'll be fun as hell if he doesn't. pic.twitter.com/VA04hFDVBX

— Akiva Cohen (@AkivaMCohen) December 2, 2022

assuming there is some kind of standing for the employees to enforce an agreement they weren't party to (which it seems like there is from the letter?) then the fact that this can be litigated by dozens of arbitration cases rather than in court(s) or class actions should be pretty lol.

that said, the specific things he's accused of not doing are not going to cost him very much (it's little things like 401k match), so he'll probably just do them and settle.

He’s so, so dumb tho

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fi8mUNhWYAAfFoe?format=jpg&name=medium

RSU vest acceleration at $54 per share sounds expensive

that could be 15% of someone's salary or 500%

for engineers 50/50 cash/stock is the mean average, and the mean average cash pay is about 200k/year = 50k/quarter.

so if he owes 3000 engineers a quarter of stock, that's ballpark low hundred millions. they're not all engineers though, so it's probably less than that, maybe high tens of millions. not nothing but not going to be his downfall.

sure, but that is more than 401k match. And is the 50/50 mean at $54 or a lower price?

Also kinda depends on what his net worth is by the time the case settles

Who is spraying Musk in Kanye's photo? Is it Epstein?

$54 is the merger price (i.e. the price elon paid for all of twitter's shares) so it makes sense.

imagine the 50/50 split is the average for hires since twitter was a public company, but if you were employee #15 or whatever, you are probably a millionaire many times over, even before the acquisition - same if you were early in the door at any other bigtech company

assuming there is some kind of standing for the employees to enforce an agreement they weren't party to (which it seems like there is from the letter?) then the fact that this can be litigated by dozens of arbitration cases rather than in court(s) or class actions should be pretty lol.

that said, the specific things he's accused of not doing are not going to cost him very much (it's little things like 401k match), so he'll probably just do them and settle.

― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Thursday, December 1, 2022 10:58 PM (yesterday)

this is the heart of it - the merger agreement specifically disclaims any twitter employee from enforcing the provisions of 6.9 (nice) via 6.9(e) (and 9.7), but the delaware court of chancery is a court of equity, not a court of law, where famously "he who comes into equity must come with clean hands", etc. etc.

is it a winning argument? i have no clue, maybe it feels a little odd that just a month ago the court of chancery was being lauded for holding elon to the letter of the law of the contract but would now be expected to look past the letter of the law of the contract (granted to enforce other parts of the contract that elon is breaching), but in both cases you have a breaching musk, so maybe it's not that weird

addendum: i forgot that this guy on twitter is going to arbitrate these claims, so it's likely not going to end up in the delaware court of chancery. but i'm assuming the arbitrators will be asked to apply delaware law. who knows! i am out of my depth here.