so many are like "keep building" bro youre a project manager at a public company calm down
― lag∞n, Monday, 27 February 2023 16:59 (one year ago) link
so much "i admire your work you're amazing" etc, it's real sad stuff. but lots of solid zings in there however.
― omar little, Monday, 27 February 2023 17:02 (one year ago) link
I work for a reasonably large, publicly-held corporation and have coworkers who date back to the time, pre-buyouts and mergers, when it was a much smaller private company and worked in the same office. They have (or in most cases, had) a genuine enthusiasm for the products/services they developed, felt like they had a stake in their work, and genuinely believed in the brand as corny as that sounds
It's just utterly foreign to the 2023 job market and idk maybe that way of life still exists somewhere but to think that twitter dot com is one of those places is absolutely bonkers to me
― mh, Monday, 27 February 2023 17:04 (one year ago) link
xxp twitter's not public anymore! I could see if you have that trad "we're building things unburdened by the whims of stockholders" mentality Elon buying it out could be a positive. I mean, maybe it could be, if it wasn't Elon
― mh, Monday, 27 February 2023 17:06 (one year ago) link
oh that is true i forgot about that part
― lag∞n, Monday, 27 February 2023 17:06 (one year ago) link
but still its not a freakin pyramid you know its just an app
― lag∞n, Monday, 27 February 2023 17:09 (one year ago) link
a good linkedin post would be what if they had jira when they were building the pyramids
― lag∞n, Monday, 27 February 2023 17:11 (one year ago) link
damn
― mh, Monday, 27 February 2023 17:16 (one year ago) link
were severely limiting access to information about the company but will be issuing worthless stock
Musk is instituting a new stock comp structure for remaining employees, which he says will go live March 24th. Meanwhile, Twitter’s Slack remains down and Musk also disabled work Google Chat, making it hard for employees to figure out the full scope of his cuts.— Alex Heath (@alexeheath) February 27, 2023
― lag∞n, Monday, 27 February 2023 17:17 (one year ago) link
like are they just emailing each other or do you have to walk over to someone's desk and bother them
― mh, Monday, 27 February 2023 17:18 (one year ago) link
i delighted in talking shit about her earlier on but I'm not going to delight in anyone losing their job at this point
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Monday, 27 February 2023 17:18 (one year ago) link
they shouldve just blocked the salute emoji instead
― lag∞n, Monday, 27 February 2023 17:19 (one year ago) link
https://media.tenor.com/ivv5dTKvV4AAAAAC/hee-haw.gif
too bad this didn't catch on instead of the emoji
― The Terroir of Tiny Town (WmC), Monday, 27 February 2023 17:24 (one year ago) link
that photo is giving greasy bland EDM and designer dick pills vibes— just a chasm of the worst shit imaginable
― giant bat fucker (gyac), Monday, 27 February 2023 17:34 (one year ago) link
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Monday, February 27, 2023 9:18 AM (twenty-six minutes ago)
cmon she probably had a bunch of stock sell at the deal price
― G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Monday, 27 February 2023 17:46 (one year ago) link
she's a rube and she shall suffer as a rube suffers
― G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Monday, 27 February 2023 17:47 (one year ago) link
replied to a weepy tesla stan and immediately got two scam replies
https://i.imgur.com/WswRiHf.png
― lag∞n, Monday, 27 February 2023 17:53 (one year ago) link
_that photo is giving greasy bland EDM and designer dick pills vibes— just a chasm of the worst shit imaginable_It’s burning man lol
― Goose Bigelow, Fowl Gigolo (the table is the table), Monday, 27 February 2023 17:57 (one year ago) link
Oh sorry I wasn’t sure if you knew - I just meant it added to the awful factor
― giant bat fucker (gyac), Monday, 27 February 2023 18:27 (one year ago) link
i feel a liiiiitle bit bad for her because there are dozens of bootlickers who have been fired or are still on the payroll who deserve similar public shaming, but it's all focusing on her because she made the mistake of bragging about sleeping in the office, and she's a woman.
i'm sure she's solvent, but she came in as a senior exec of an acquired company with the stock schedule to go with it, and she's now been fired for cause, which means she likely went from being a paper multi-millionaire to ... not that over the weekend per https://esq.social/@annmlipton/109935966313883066. lol.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 27 February 2023 18:32 (one year ago) link
whatre u gonna do you know
― lag∞n, Monday, 27 February 2023 18:38 (one year ago) link
they took down slack so what, employees can just use twitter DMs instead (very stable)
― 龜, Monday, 27 February 2023 18:42 (one year ago) link
ever hear of.... dogfooding????
ooh why did that not even occur to me? genius play
― mh, Monday, 27 February 2023 18:50 (one year ago) link
ever heard of cat food its like dog food except for a cat
― lag∞n, Monday, 27 February 2023 18:51 (one year ago) link
lool
https://www.garbageday.email/p/i-remembered-how-awful-it-is-to-go
So my hypothesis went like this: Twitter is using invisible subreddits via Topics to algorithmically organize tweets. Because the For You page isn’t chronological anymore, viral tweets can’t be as timely as they used to be. They have to be kind of evergreen. It helps if they’re commenting on something that’s already going viral. And it really helps if you post a thread, reply to yourself, or create some kind of discussion in the replies. There also seems to be a bigger emphasis on video now....Anyways, I can safely say I understand how Twitter works now. It’s basically just Reddit moving at the speed of Tumblr.
...
Anyways, I can safely say I understand how Twitter works now. It’s basically just Reddit moving at the speed of Tumblr.
― 𝔠𝔞𝔢𝔨 (caek), Monday, 27 February 2023 19:12 (one year ago) link
cat food becomes cat turd, think about it
― rob, Monday, 27 February 2023 19:28 (one year ago) link
...my god
― lag∞n, Monday, 27 February 2023 19:29 (one year ago) link
am I the only person who has no appreciable difference between their 'for your' and 'following' tabs?
― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Monday, 27 February 2023 20:39 (one year ago) link
The biggest change when I click on "For You" is that I start seeing all the gay porn tweets one of my followers likes.
― but also fuck you (unperson), Monday, 27 February 2023 21:01 (one year ago) link
lmao
― lag∞n, Monday, 27 February 2023 21:17 (one year ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmnqX4iNBpI
― Alicia Silver Stone (Boring, Maryland), Monday, 27 February 2023 21:33 (one year ago) link
dragging anyone for being raised in a cult is nagl (even esther crawford)
― micah, Monday, 27 February 2023 22:00 (one year ago) link
I don't think anyone itt is dragging her for being raised in a cult, they are dragging her for her Elon bootlicking. The former wasn't her choice, but the latter definitely is.
― Maxmillion D. Boosted (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Monday, 27 February 2023 22:02 (one year ago) link
I can understand the confusion. We’re dragging her for that Burning Man wedding picture and burners are kind of culty, and for having faith that her hard work at twitter would curry Elon’s favor, when twitter under Elon is culty
I don’t think anyone is mocking the actual cult experience, although it does raise questions
― mh, Monday, 27 February 2023 23:24 (one year ago) link
just a chasm of the worst shit imaginable
how, in the Name of God, has no one called for this to be the new board description, in the seven hours, SEVEN HOURS I SAY, since it was most nobly posted? for the love of all that is holy.
― J Edgar Noothgrush (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Tuesday, 28 February 2023 00:27 (one year ago) link
I mean the whole "why is she still bootlicking after they betrayed her" thing is a little undeserved, unfortunately if you are a lets say 'ambitious' person you really can't talk shit about your former employer even if they really fucked you over. my wife went through that and it sucks. everything else about her is fair game though
― frogbs, Tuesday, 28 February 2023 00:36 (one year ago) link
she had the option of saying nothing, is all.
― G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Tuesday, 28 February 2023 00:45 (one year ago) link
She's a true poster
― Chyiv Kyiv (Fetchboy), Tuesday, 28 February 2023 00:50 (one year ago) link
better to etc etc
― G. D’Arcy Cheesewright (silby), Tuesday, 28 February 2023 00:54 (one year ago) link
Idk maybe she wants to work for another insane rich dude who thinks a dedicated employee sleeps on the floor
― frogbs, Tuesday, 28 February 2023 01:09 (one year ago) link
Hey I'm right here
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 28 February 2023 01:15 (one year ago) link
― mh, Tuesday, 28 February 2023
having a traumatic childhood experience doesnt "raise questions"
― micah, Tuesday, 28 February 2023 01:33 (one year ago) link
No need to dunk on her for her past when she's saying things like this
If you can’t take being publicly dunked on then be sure to avoid taking any risks and stay away from all leadership roles. Don’t build or disrupt anything. Stay small and invisible and most of all, be silent and afraid of what others think.— Esther Crawford ✨ (@esthercrawford) February 27, 2023
― papal hotwife (milo z), Tuesday, 28 February 2023 01:36 (one year ago) link
She has terminal Silicon Valley brainworms it would never occur to her to be anything but a bootlicker to people who have more money, obviously they're superior.
― papal hotwife (milo z), Tuesday, 28 February 2023 01:37 (one year ago) link
xxp that’s fair and it’s rude of me to speculate, but I did read the entire series of tweets about her experience and it wasn’t necessarily painted in a negative light, just something she moved past
maybe there are aspects of my upbringing that make the SV mindset foreign to me just as there are aspects of either her adult life or perhaps her childhood that make that mindset appealing to her. she draws a line herself between what she’s learned from her experiences and her business/personal philosophy
― mh, Tuesday, 28 February 2023 01:50 (one year ago) link
and, as caek mentioned, there are better targets for actual ire when it comes to former twitter employees, it’s just the narrative thread of Crawford’s recent online posts that is tempting to unravel. I don’t think there’s a lot to unravel or, as I said, questions to answer. If you keep reading her posts, she answered them all already
― mh, Tuesday, 28 February 2023 01:53 (one year ago) link
y'all really like saying 'bootlicker' huh
― mookieproof, Tuesday, 28 February 2023 02:25 (one year ago) link
TS: Boot lickers vs. Boot knockers
― INDEPENDENTS DAY BY STEVEN SPILBERG (President Keyes), Tuesday, 28 February 2023 02:28 (one year ago) link
esther is my fave dilbert character tbh
― liberal with a capital LIE (Hunt3r), Tuesday, 28 February 2023 02:34 (one year ago) link