Posts you had second thought about and decided not to post - put them here

What happened to Karl Malone?

I think Karl rebranded, no?

So he's.... post-Malone?

better now

Funnily enough that's my precise reaction whenever I see one of your worthless internet hardman posts.

^ lol I wish I knew who this was in relation to

it's always such a chore checking thru the threads you don't normally read

one of my fave things about this thread is conducting the sna inquest to see who the arsehole is!

https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/w6yvBURPnSiQ96B-zMSVBu_H5Ms=/10x0:490x320/920x613/filters:focal(10x0:490x320):format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/1955233/2042609-phoenix_wright.0.jpg

https://media.tenor.com/pKhtbmQh1RIAAAAM/edgeworth.gif
“Typical reaction from the ilx left”

Ask not for whom the “second thoughts” thread posts…

lol truthbomb

also have we any even attempted hardmen left tbh

we haven't had any viagra spammers in a while tis true

good to find!

Not a hardman so much as an intentionally boorish and dismissive tit who is too boring to actually get into a pissing match with because life's too short and anyway this thread exists so you don't have to.

whoa, it's time to play "narc or narcissist," eh?

it's heartening that we have factions that dislike one another just like the Left IRL!

decent leaving certificate, honours bachelors of business, national cert in local government administration, postgraduate diploma computer science, the usual professional certifications in project management and operations management

Asses whose taste surprised you

rimshot

ok lol

Racists have students loans too

Potential Samantha Fox comeback hit

Robyn iirc

…And actually given that I have had a number of men on ilx fixate on posts of mine/my inability to laugh at non-jokes, I really don’t think I need this pointing out to me. Not even just me experiencing that, the Tár thread was pretty fucking appalling with how Roz was talked over/to/about by a load of men.

it's the standard i get held to, right? you maybe don't mean to say it, you maybe don't intend to say it, but i hear it. i hear it loud and clear. mansplaining. i'm mansplaining women's experiences to a woman, who of course knows all about this, who isn't some johnny-come-lately to this stuff, who wasn't _socialized male_.

i am sorry. i am genuinely sorry for saying what i did in that way, i was responding to you and saying something that wasn't directed at you, and it was reasonable for you to interpret that as directed at you, and you being upset was absolutely a justified response. i made a mistake in how i phrased what i said, and i'm sorry.

tbh I think what you said was fine rushomancy

a lot of people have similar thoughts and experiences and sometimes they repeat things other people have previously said. And generally the intent isn't to talk over / ignore what the previous people said, but just to share their own thoughts and experiences, because it's their turn to share ... like, going around in a circle in some sort of group therapy exercise? It depends on the thread, though ... that masculinity thread sure feels like a group therapy exercise to me idk.

Xps there are cis women on here I’ve actively disagreed with in harsher terms. I just objected to the tangible experience that I’ve had on here being left out of the conversation, I’ve mentioned it a number of times and didn’t feel like doing so again on a thread about masculinity.

i mean sure. this isn't the first time recently that.. i've gotten the impression that you believe that i personally talked over your experience. the way i talked about my experience with autism spectrum disorder, for instance. you know at a certain point something starts seeming like a pattern of behavior, and when i feel like somebody has talked about things in a way that invalidates my lived experience twice in a month, i'm likely to start drawing broader conclusions.

Sorry what was the ASD thing, I honestly don’t recall that?

oh, it was just me talking about my selective mutism, honestly i probably read more into it than i meant to. i've gotten a lot of certain kinds of criticism and when i see something that _looks_ like that sort of criticism it activates me pretty hard. i'm not apologizing for being activated, you did misinterpret something i said and kinda go off on me yesterday, but i feel like i've done the processing i need to not take it personally.

I’m still trying to find the other example (selective mutism?) cos I am coming up short of examples of us even posting on the same thread in the past month.

i don't know, thread drift happens, the thread was nothing to do with ASD, maybe it was the ADHD thread? anyway the fact that you don't even remember it, to me that's a clear sign to me that i was reading more into it than was there, and that's kind of all i need to know.

Yeah I had a quick look back through my posting history going back to the 9th June and I didn’t see that I’d posted in that thread or about anything related.

no worries. maybe i'm misremembering. my memory is _extremely_ fallible. frustrates the hell out of me.

I mean, I get that you're jonesing, but as someone who's seen a lot of social media come and go, it's really depressing to get a popular alternative, with the momentum to make something happen, and the first thing that people think of is "Here's a list of ways that it needs to be more like Twitter"

my new straight-edge revival band, "the town squares"

i've put a lot of effort into engaging with that thread, when someone does a drive-by to say "lol this thread sucks" it doesn't exactly make me feel great about myself

i know i'm hypersensitive to criticism and i take generalized criticism personally when i shouldn't, i'm working on it

I was offended too.

this 'someone' does this in multiple threads

xps this is the second time this week you have taken something as directed at you when it wasn’t. Do I have to post “Scott Seward is ruining what were interesting lines of conversation with his shit” to avoid this? Because I will. And please, do killfile me, I don’t think you implying I was being dismissive about neurodiversity when we’ve never had a conversation about it was exactly great but I guess I should just wear that, right? Signed, “someone”.

gyac, I value your posts but these threads are meant to be digressive. I don't think scott killed the discussion -- it's still going.

i can stay away from that thread if you guys want. i do tend to babble so. can't hardly help myself. i'll stick to records.

i do learn a lot from that thread. i'll just read it.

Well tbh I was being pretty rude about it - it’s personal preference, if a discussion is interesting I prefer it to play out rather than someone feeling the need to post jokes or whatever? But two wrongs etc.

please, do killfile me

...and then I'll make a big fuss about everyone ignoring me

Why would I complain about being ignored by people I don’t have positive interactions with?

i can stay away from that thread if you guys want. i do tend to babble so. can't hardly help myself. i'll stick to records.

― scott seward

scott please do not stay away from that thread, i value your being in that thread and would actively like you to continue posting to it.

xps this is the second time this week you have taken something as directed at you when it wasn’t.

i mean that's a fair point! i genuinely don't mean to be snarky here but i feel like i did point that out explicitly in my post, that i take things as being directed at me that aren't?

Do I have to post “Scott Seward is ruining what were interesting lines of conversation with his shit” to avoid this? Because I will. And please, do killfile me, I don’t think you implying I was being dismissive about neurodiversity when we’ve never had a conversation about it was exactly great but I guess I should just wear that, right? Signed, “someone”.

― (who is an amazing ice cream maker by the way) (gyac)

ok since my initial comment kind of underexplained i'm going to completely overexplain here, warning i will use a lot of therapy talk, i'll try to do it in a healthy manner but if someone's not into that they might want to skip the rest of this post. i'm just super autistic and a big nerd about analyzing social dynamics and how they play out in practice.

i also do feel like responding in-depth like this has a pretty good likelihood of being counter-productive to you specifically, you've talked about having a long history of being mansplained to and getting the impression that you're being talked over, but i kind of have to let that go, because i'm talking for my own purposes and not to resolve any conflict we have directly

so as to your question i do think it generally is good if i have a problem with a specific person to address it to them rather than to generalize it. that said it's also something i find challenging, sometimes i take issues i'm having and sort of transfer them onto someone else (haha well maybe freud did have _one_ good idea once).

and that is explicitly my intent with my my first post in this thread this morning. i didn't name you specifically but i figured that you read this thread and that you'd know i was talking about you. this is sort of the default subtweet thread, but for me, i think it's good for sort of meta-discussion, talking about things that don't really fit in. i didn't name you simply because i didn't want to place an implicit obligation on you to respond, it was more kind of an opener than anything else.

because criticism _does_ have a tendency to come off as confrontational. it was important to me to... express my feelings rather than burying them, because that gets me in trouble. and i tried to do that in a healthy way without putting any obligation on you. that first post was textbook therapy-speak, honestly, in that it was entirely self-centered. and sometimes that does get annoying, that i'm always talking about myself, but particularly when i'm being critical i try not to frame it in terms of "you did this wrong, you did that wrong", the "when you x, i feel y" thing has a cause and effect but ultimately you're not responsible for my emotions, and that second para where i acknowledged my tendency to personalize generalized criticism was meant to underline that message.

and as it turns out other thread participants _did_ find your comment unhelpful and snarky and _have_ expressed that, independently from me, so i feel like it was good and appropriate for me to say what i said

the other reason that i said that is so i _don't_ essentialize you, i don't turn isolated incidents into a pattern of behavior, which, again, i do have a tendency to do. when i do post criticisms, i try to not do them in haste, in the heat of the moment. this was something i used to do a lot, this is kind of standard practice for discourse. this is sort of an issue i have with twitter is how _fast_ it moves, it encourages people to not wait until the initial emotional reaction passes, and that does tend to escalate conflict rather than de-escalate conflict. and that's kind of part of internet culture, unfortunately, that was part of this board's formative culture, part of the culture of usenet before that. it's a natural tendency for me and i actively work to not fall into that tendency.

giving myself that small amount of time, it can be as little as five minutes, to get past that emotional reaction is really helpful because a lot of the time when i get past that initial emotional reaction i realize that i don't actually need to make a response to whatever it was that created the emotional response. but sometimes there is an external reason that i feel like i need to address in ways that are directly critical of other people. that's scary and i don't like doing that, but in this case i felt like i did need to, and i do feel like i was right in doing that.

---

anyway i'm not really interested in killfiling you, i do that only in extreme circumstances. i think i've done it like once, to someone who i believe has subsequently been banned from ilx. when i'm going to cut ties, set a rigid boundary with someone i _don't_ criticize them. at that point i've decided that there's no point in talking to them about anything. i haven't reached that point with you, though, and since i haven't reached that point and i don't _want_ to reach that point, i feel like it's best to address in as direct and honest a manner as possible situations that _could_ lead to that point. and that might be now! sometimes identifying a problem, you know, it can't be resolved. i'm just personally in a headspace where i'm wanting to let go of any hostility i might have in a way that's healthy and not destructive. that's what i'm trying to do, and i don't know whether i've succeeded or not. i feel like i've succeeded at that, to a significant extent.