Donald Trump: Classic or Dud?

wow, the woke colorado supreme court

Bold to call others a "RINO", he's the living embodiment of that term

Trump's political party affiliation has changed numerous times. He registered as a Republican in 1987; a member of the Independence Party, the New York state affiliate of the Reform Party, in 1999; a Democrat in 2001; a Republican in 2009; unaffiliated in 2011; and a Republican in 2012.

So he actually LEFT the GOP in 2001

it's funny that any of this is even a question, since the constitution bans people who engage in insurrection from holding office, which trump obviously did (whenever it's suggested that there is anything other 100% certainty on this i feel gaslit as fuck and so do hundreds of millions of other people), but the u.s. supreme court will bail him out anyway.

They haven't been real interested in saving Trump's ass so far

I have a feeling they're going to hinge a lot on the Senate not convicting him. Just cannot see SCOTUS letting it stand. But also wtf do I know.

I think even the most right-wing supreme court judges won't work towards reducing, even giving up their own judicial power, to suit a very strange nazi period of republican party history - that probably isn't that strange in the context of the history of US fascism, exceptions like Aileen Cannon seem like in a tiny minority.

is Aileen Cannon a supreme court judge? fuck knows I'm going to bed!

Dang, Donnie

I can see Clarence Thomas going for that but the other rightwing judges haven't really ruled in Trump's favor on anything so far

I have a feeling they're going to hinge a lot on the Senate not convicting him. Just cannot see SCOTUS letting it stand. But also wtf do I know.

― a man often referred to in the news media as the Duke of Saxony (tipsy mothra), Tuesday, December 19, 2023

completely agree. although he's not going to win the general election in Colorado in any case

well this is some fabulous news!

Rudy, Colorado, what’s the third

Does SCOTUS even have to hear this? Or can they just mumble something about sovereign state election laws and let it stand

The fight isn't really about Colorado — the suit was under the U.S. Constitution, if SCOTUS upholds it presumably it applies nationwide right? If you're violating the 14th Amendment in Denver, you're violating it in Des Moines.

Anyway, his name is clearly going to stay on the primary ballot even in Colorado, because the order is stayed. But I guess we'll get an actual SCOTUS ruling on this. Interesting times.

It will be interesting to see which states remove Biden from the ballot

thanks to hunter's nude freebasing

Might as well be

I think even the most right-wing supreme court judges won't work towards reducing, even giving up their own judicial power, to suit a very strange nazi period of republican party history - that probably isn't that strange in the context of the history of US fascism, exceptions like Aileen Cannon seem like in a tiny minority.

i'd say both that yours is a very reasonable take but that unfortunately, no, recent history has shown that it's not a tiny minority: there are many judges who are just completely fraudulent pieces of shit and everyone knows it. clarence thomas couldn't possibly have more conflicts of interest. he'll be one of the votes that delivers trump

He wasn’t going to win colorado anyway so I’m the end does this even matter

If it flies in Colorado I assume other states will be lining up to disqualify him.

Doesn't this also remove him from the primary or no?

The appeal will probably outlast the primary contest, at least.

it's bad news at any rate (i'm actually in a very good mood right now, for jobseeking reasons (i can't pay my rent and i may have just landed a decent job), so please don't take this as doomer shit. i am typing this in as good of a mood as you can be in while paying even a minimum amount of attention to what is happening in the world). it's bad news because one outcome is that the supreme court says it's fine that trump is now openly trying to be a dictator (or authoritarian/dictator/fascism/useful fool/whatever), which seems to be yet another milestone on in the collapse of democracy (or however long ago you think that's in the rearview now). the other outcome is that the supreme court does disallow trump from being on the primary ballot. i'll just note at this point that there's a new A24 movie called civil war which appears to try to be apolitical

that 'civil war' movie from the little I've read sounds like sci-fi, which if that's the case I'm down for

The fight isn't really about Colorado — the suit was under the U.S. Constitution, if SCOTUS upholds it presumably it applies nationwide right? If you're violating the 14th Amendment in Denver, you're violating it in Des Moines.

This is pretty much it. I’d like to think the three justices selected by that fascist asshat would recuse themselves, leaving at least a 3-3 ruling (or perhaps 4-2 with Robert’s joining) upholding the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling, thus sending other states to make similar rulings in accordance with the law, and finally putting this shit show away. It would be doing us all a solid and leaving a great start to the New Year. Whatever, we’ll see I guess.

*Roberts

Rudy, Colorado, what’s the third

The Ghost of Christmas Future, IIRC.

Just based on how aligned the conservative justices are with the GOP, they will do whatever they think is necessary to preserve the GOP. It is the primary instrument of power for conservatism. Since Trump has recreated the party as his fiefdom, denying Trump ballot access would mean exploding the power base of the party. They will not be any more principled or any less craven than the Congress has been.

I agree with tipsy that the Senate's failure to convict will be their excuse. They can't really duck the responsibility of settling the primary constitutional question that's been raised. It's the whole reason the SCOTUS exists.

^ And I hope like hell I'm wrong.

I do think you’re wrong but we’ll see. I think that for better or worse the justices are lifetime appointees and realize that Trump will be dead soon and another nutiob republican will then seek power and the justices would rather align themselves with long-term movement than with the unseemly Trump. Alito and Thomas may not cooperate with this approach but I don’t think the others will further ruin their legacies on behalf of Trump. But we’ll see!

I think they will overturn the Colorado Supreme Court decision

and I don't think their legacies will be ruined because of it, they will just go on as before, and we will bow down to them when they die

I just don’t see how the SC could kick him off the ballot. He hasn’t been convicted of insurrection in the Senate or in a Court. I suppose they could make up a new power, but that would be pretty iffy.

https://i.imgur.com/CDToKFX.png

we are FUCKED if people don't know this

god fucking dammit, section 3 of that. just skip to that

FUCK

not to be sheeple, but sheeple, fuck, read the goddamn constitution so you can see them lie to you about it to your face

Eye of beholder basically

oof yeah, that's going to be a moment, when they argue their way out of section 3, but yes. honestly my view is hold on tight, holy shit

this whole case is basically a referendum on whether you believe in complete bullshit or not

Not sure what you mean tho. No one has convicted Trump of insurrection. The SC would have to decide he was guilty.

It seems like it says the remedy to the situation is for congress to remove by ⅔ vote, which they already had the opportunity to do.

The flip of that, I wonder, is that these pending trials accusing him of insurrection, if the supreme court says he is not an insurrectionist, does that invalidate all these January 6 cases?

Anyway, they should definitely impeach Trump.

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/colorado-supreme-court-disqualifies-trump-from-gop-ballot

So far, other courts to have addressed the question of Trump’s eligibility in light of the Disqualification Clause’s ban on former officials who engaged in insurrection have rejected efforts to bar him from seeking office on grounds of jurisdiction. The Colorado Supreme Court, in a case brought by good government nonprofit CREW, has now made a landmark, first-ever ruling in the country’s history: disqualifying a candidate from the presidency for having violated the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.

The ruling ratifies the lower court finding that Trump engaged in insurrection on Jan. 6, under a measure used to keep Confederate officials away from power.

Yeah the fact that he hasn’t been convicted seems like it’ll be a sticking point

it doesn't say he has to have been convicted of it, simply that he took part in it. that seems incontrovertibly true to me but then I am not a brain damaged SC justice

if the supreme court says he is not an insurrectionist, does that invalidate all these January 6 cases?

i think there's a judicial process answer to this question, which many are likely to defend all the way up until it happens, and then there's the practical answer, which will likely be violent

i am actually still in a good mood so i'm going to stop dwelling on this for now, sorry! but i will suggest the possibility of pretending like we just heard that our favorite guy joe biden is off the ballot in colorado, and it's because of some republican judge bullshit. biden is off the ballot and now republicans win colorado. that's why it would or will get violent.

in that situation we would think it was absurd that biden get kicked off a ballot while trump, demonstrably corrupt to the bone and a will to fascism, gets to run free. that's how conservative people, the kind that actually vote for them, think. the sliver of 'reasonable' conservatives is gone now. those that figured it out post 2016 and especially 2017 and especially any year after that can fuck off for the rest of their lives. so instead all that's left of conservatism is the dogmatic kind. all they see is trump is off the ballot in colorado, and it's because of some democratic judge bullshit. trump is off the ballot and now democrats win colorado. that's why it would or will get violent. what actually happened is becoming something like a curiosity

things are escalating and people are listening to other people who suggest that there

...be hugs

ok be well but in general i think it's going to be a time of reckoning with real fascism, incoming, soon. i realize that's on the more negative side of thoughts about the future but it seems real to me, and (sorry, i know, i know) growing up in a pentecostal church, i have seen these fuckers and what they want, it's not good