A Paler Shade of White---Sasha Frere-Jones Podcast and New Yorker article Criticizing Indie Rock for Failing to Incorporate African-American Influences

it's kind of amazing what you've been reduced to pointing out in this save-a-ho gambit, john

i can't remember EVER looking to indie rock for any kind of "blackness" or sounds of blackness. these days i don't look to indie rock for anything at all. once or twice a year a band sticks out and that's about it. i do pine for the days when new wave and new wave/dance acts and post-punk bands stole like hell and took anything that wasn't nailed down from any and every culture on earth. those were the days. and electroclash didn't do anything for me. and by new wave i mean everything from talking heads on up to whatever. but maybe my definition of indie rock is screwy. there isn't an indie band alive today who could conceive of or execute this gem:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=QOoZAyJrB-8

it's amazing to me how many pasty new wave boys had disco, like, DEEP in their bones. it was like a part of them in such an organic way.

I think you mean "that" you've been reduced to anthony but don't let writing sentences get in your way man

again

seriously dude I know it makes you feel clever to bust out the "save-a-ho" trope but I'm just pointing out that Royal Trux are hardly bringing the funk now or ever and it's weird/annoying how partisan everybody (even/especially you) is that such an egregiously bizarre cite won't get a callout because it appears in a piece tilting against the windmill we've all agreed to charge

keep zingin' though man I'm sure it feels rad

sasha is silly to bring up devendra. his entire vocal persona is based on nina simone, ella jenkins, and billie holiday.

Trashthumb - to even think about creating the space you talk about, the bubble where musicians 'don't have to take those factors into consideration' is political. And just because music doesn't have lyrics doesn't cleanse it of meaning

I'm aware that 'everything is political' or rhetorical, or academic, or any way you want to say it, and yes it's an active choice to be apolitical. And instrumental music certainly has meaning, but I think it's a lot more difficult to include explicit societal dialogue without them. Abstract art needs a placard, and instrumental music needs at least some declaration of intent unless it's overt, liner notes, for any politicizing to be something other than guesswork. It's still going to have a feeling, which gives it a personal or human meaning, and if you use a structure from 'black' music you're going to evoke that tradition and that culture, but I feel like this kind of talk marginalizes the sound, but what criticism doesn't, more noise surrounding the purpose of music, listening to it.

John, I just think its funny that ever since Jess cockblocked you and Mr. Que (for not offering IDEAS, ironically), you show up every 200 posts to point out the one half-way off-key complaint about SFJ's piece (i.e. that he isn't ASKING the arcade fire to get fonky, just that he wanted to hear some groove after six of their songs) or declare some one-liner "the best thing on this thread. Now you're going "royal trux? O RLY?" in the face of an article so obviously greater than the one you're not even really defending. I know you're grateful for the exposure he gave you, but its time you ask yourself what he's done for you lately.

that shoud be (complaining that I wasn't offering IDEAS, ironically)

sasha is silly to bring up devendra. his entire vocal persona is based on nina simone, ella jenkins, and billie holiday.

yeah that one struck me as really weird, there's all kinds of coded/racinated stuff going on in db's vocal delivery - some of it so over-the-top that I've always been a little surprised that more people don't dwell on it (lots of T. Rex comparisons around the time of the first studio album but any Al Jolson refs? 'cause that's kinda who he sounds like) but there's all kinds of weird genre stuff going on just in the way devendra sings

xpost anthony I basically read the last ten posts and see what I have to say. Your accusation that I'm somehow repaying a favor is off-target, but I'm sure it makes you feel good about yourself, so fuck you.

...and for you to be accusing anybody of nitpicking is, y'know, some pot/kettle shit

Not to butt into the clash of the titans, but when I read that line in the Slate piece I was like, "Yeah, Trux, obviously!" Not that they're primarily a funk band but (a) they were on at least one two-drummer show I saw and (b) they were certainly coming out of all manner of 70's bluesy rock that SFJ rightly points out is way funkier than most 00's rock.

I'm just trying to assign your inexplicable cherry-picking of what to acknowledge on this thread a motivation I can understand/sympathize with, John. Has nothing to do with my ego.

whatever dude

Is John D.. you know...

Trashthumb....

I really don't know where you think you can draw a line between the 'personal and human meaning' and the political, and i can think of plenty of abstract art that's part of an explicit social dialogue..... but its late on my side of the Atlantic, so if the conversation is still anywhere in this neighbourhood in the AM, I may have more...

yes (xpost)

http://www.nndb.com/people/372/000024300/john-davidson-3-sized.jpg

Yes.

people talk shit about my daytime show but I was years ahead of my time

we all loved you growing up : )

were you on "The Price is Right"?

John, I don't necessarily think you have any reason to defend SFJ's piece that goes against what you really do believe or operates on grounds of personal loyalty or selfishness or whatever. But you have to be aware of the fact that considering that this is a critic who has called you "America’s best non-hip-hop lyricist," it's gonna come out looking a certain way.

"lots of T. Rex comparisons around the time of the first studio album but any Al Jolson refs? 'cause that's kinda who he sounds like)"

definitely. he is not alone there. antony and cocorosie and devendra are all in love with karen dalton. someone who wanted to sound like the oldest and blackest woman who ever lived. (tim buckley too had the jolson thing going on. another fave.)

I'm just trying to assign your inexplicable cherry-picking of what to acknowledge on this thread a motivation I can understand/sympathize with, John.

I mean really, Anthony: is this even true, or just a rhetorical stance? Half the things SFJ says are things his detractors on this thread have said & will again say, in various permutations, on threads here; cherry-picking is the name of the game here. There are some basic formal considerations (backbeat, swing) that he's talking about that you, zingmaster in extremis, aren't particularly interested in, even though they're primary in this discussion: why does so much mainstream indie eschew these properties, and mightn't it mean anything? I don't agree with SFJ about loads of stuff (for example: I don't give a shit about indie rock with some occasional exceptions), but this whole thread seems like mainly jealous haters doing the "my kid could paint better than that!" schtick, with some occasional and on-point exceptions. That he manages to troll all the free-weekly/blog ppl so successfully is kind Madonna-In-Her-Primesque from where I sit. But who knows, maybe I'm just trying to help him out on a pointless ILX thread owing to extreme gratitude about an article he wrote four years ago.

Alex, for sure, but c'mon: as true as that may be, and as nutty as I can get, does anybody who knows me really think I'd go "gotta defend dudebrah, he likes my shit?" C'mon. I may be cantankerous/nuts/corny, but I don't roll like that.

also plenty of those hiphop cats couldn't go twelve bars with me and they know it, so if anything I got beef with MC F-J

Trashthumb....

I really don't know where you think you can draw a line between the 'personal and human meaning' and the political, and i can think of plenty of abstract art that's part of an explicit social dialogue..... but its late on my side of the Atlantic, so if the conversation is still anywhere in this neighbourhood in the AM, I may have more...

I know that the postmodern assumption is that all ideas are available, and free to be discussed, and that society certainly has a role in dictating how people perceive music, but ultimately I'd like to see the meaning<->feeling dichotomy a little less polarized. And yea there's plenty of abstract art related to society or culture, overtly, like Urinal and 4'33", and I guess I'll be doing the terrible 'cherry-picking' because I'm not familiar with abstract art that's more political. I think both of them are about freeing the media from its rhetorical confines, although obviously they generated a lot of rhetoric and still do. It's been unfair of me to try and isolate the artists feeling from society, because everyone feels its pressure and that impacts the mood. To stop from being verbose, and further digging myself into a hole, I'm just trying to look for a 'solution' to political discussion of music, because although I think it's interesting, it's not what I'm concerned with as a musician. I want to see more aesthetic/theory discussion is really all, sorry to be a pain my first day on this forum

There are some basic formal considerations (backbeat, swing) that he's talking about that you, zingmaster in extremis, aren't particularly interested in, even though they're primary in this discussion: why does so much mainstream indie eschew these properties, and mightn't it mean anything?

I guess you must have missed the 500 posts detailing this, but most of the complaints with the article aren't that so much indie lacks backbeat and swing, but that he's arguing it once had it. Plus, as the Carl Wilson piece notes (a piece that restates much of what's been posted here), he's doing a piss-poor job theorizing why indie "lost" it. I'm sorry I went for the low blow, but you need to get over the "zingmaster" thing but take off the blinders at look at the complaints me and EVERYONE else here have been making on this thread, cuz you seem to be avoiding acknowledging them.

too drunk now to stay mad, gimme kisses daddy

you did have to be trolled into writing anything more than one-line crankypants posts on this thread and you know it

uh, yeah, cuz I already wrote my peace on the other thread that I LINKED to and the BEGINNING of the thread.

Also from the beginning, from Jess: John and mr. que's weird pile-up mostly seems born out of unwilling to do the unpacking of the SEVERAL YEARS WORTH OF DISCUSSION WEVE ALREADY HAD ON THIS TOPIC including THE SAME SHIT SFJ TRIED FOISTING UPON US A FEW YEARS BACK CIRCA EMP TIME that anthony has managed to squeeze into his "one-line bitchouts" ala "basically limits to folkies and brian wilson fans"

at the beginning of the thread, sorry so typo

There are some basic formal considerations (backbeat, swing) that he's talking about that you, zingmaster in extremis, aren't particularly interested in, even though they're primary in this discussion: why does so much mainstream indie eschew these properties, and mightn't it mean anything?

I think a lot of the prejudice against those sounds might be because they're happy and fun, and I know a lot of people (young, disillusioned 'indie' people) who seem to resent happiness and marginalize it as being stupid, unless of course something tickles their fancy and even then they excuse it as a guilty pleasure. Authenticity is important as well, and a lot of them probably didn't listen to that stuff growing up, and feel that they don't have any claim to it (since it's black culture), even though recent things they've heard they acquire with ease and then praise. It's easier to avoid it, and try and make music that sounds 'transcendent' or some other extreme, than risk inevitable racial discussion of your music and disenfranchising your neurotic white middle class audience. That's still all implicit, and I don't see why there's such a massive discussion of 'is not' rather than is, and why society led it that way. Then again, maybe I'm just upset because I'm reacting against music, something I needlessly sanctify, getting the same treatment as my Medieval lit class in some regards.

also you know Carl Wilson is also a fan of my stuff so yr bogosity in that regard is doubled: I don't take sides based on who likes me or I'd hate, like, 95% of the population

saying "I said it elsewhere" is a copout: if the question's so boring to you, why are you here?

thank you for admitting you're trolling, John

I don't see the huge crime in one-line posts, especially in the context of a long discussion that adds up to a hefty wordcount's worth of writing on the subject. I don't need to see any proof that Anthony can write in full paragraphs without being goaded into doing so.

thank you for admitting you're trolling, John

I learned it from you, Dad

I don't see the huge crime in one-line posts

Alex I have love for you but own up now, you have a horse in this race

you're all vv pretty <3

royal trux was way fonkier than 90% of the music mentioned on this thread, even when they weren't even trying.

howling hex has some crazy funk too

John didn't say RT wasn't funky, but that SFJ said they were funky we would have laughed at him because we're just haters frothing at the mouth and John's the Omega Man.

that if SFJ

what? i dropped a bunch of glib one-liners in this thread and also a few fat, indulgent paragraphs. I'm not going to wait until i have at least 200 words to post anything if I have a small thought now that I can throw into the fray. (xpost)

I'm just pointing out that Royal Trux are hardly bringing the funk now or ever

reads to me like, well, whatever. who has the energy for a good ol' ilm clusterfuck thread anymore anyway? not me.

ah missed that and was dealing with his first ref to Trux why do I suspect that if this line had come from the SFJ article he'd presently be getting raked both ways over the coals for citing Royal Trux as counterexample to the "does not swing" trend

If everyone's hope here is that the distinction between black and white music go away, because everyone is allowed to reference anything, then the next argument becomes why aren't the African Americans referencing 'white music'. Since it's almost impossible for a genre/culture and its ethnic origin to be dissolved, except through saturation, then the thrust of all this seems to eliminate identity, but since there's still the white european tradition of art music, they still have the 'historical' upper hand, whatever that means. Indie music is currently co-opting plenty of Balkan influence, and since those people are white, it's not taboo, and it doesn't bring up a talking point. It also achieves the goal of only being a reference point in terms of aesthetic, and not ethnicity of the performer. Is the solution to only use one or two components from the 'other' music, so that theres a slow desensitization to white people performing it, until it can be co-opted completely and only be historically black, by entering the comfort zone its lost its exclusivity, and I wouldn't doubt people want to maintain that to some degree. Comfort zone only functions in this argument with whites, and its only a function of race, they're uncomfortable because of authenticity, not because a lack of native familiarity or connection with the music. And if you don't have that, why should you incorporate these elements, knowing that they're going to politicize your music.

If a white guy lives in New Orleans and plays in a jazz funeral, then that's not going to raise any eyebrows, because that's their regional identity, which gives them some leeway in terms of authenticity. This entire argument is based around a tenuous conception of race, when most aesthetic is probably a result of what people listened to in the car with their parents as kids. I know this is a jumble, I just can't organize my thoughts, some reason I can't write a damn paper.

Well, he had 900+ ILM posts to draw inspiration from.

except Carl Wilson really didn't need them, dude can think for himself

yeah, while I wouldn't be shocked if he read part of this thread, there was nothing here that was obviously lifted for the piece. The problems are pretty obvious, and his points re: class went beyond most of the zings here.

Just re-read the Slate piece. Yup, still great.

It's been pointed out elsewhere on this site but the first two chapters of Wilson's forthcoming book will find their way to anyone who emails letstalkaboutceline at yahoo dot com.

Yes, I got those two chapters and thought they were great - no idea if he can sustain that over the length of a whole book, though?