North Korea (and Darfur and other humanitarian crises) - What can we do?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (113 of them)
that's the bitch of it. at the end of the day, folks are still dying and somebody's gotta stop it. problems result when it's gone about like the current thing, which was to take a kinda fucked-up situation and then go about it in such massively incompetent & bad faith means that made things a lot worse...

Evan Dorkin wrote something in one of this comix along the lines of "one of the reasons that this planet sucks is because the only people in it are the people in it," but that fact shouldn't necessarily stop you.

kingfish completely hatstand (Kingfish), Thursday, 11 August 2005 05:48 (eighteen years ago) link

but there are ways to go about fixing these problems that don't always involve invasion. There's the old quote about "when all you have is a hammer, everything begins to look like a nail." of course, match that with my conservative draftee father's telling of how the informal U.S. Army solution to anything(circa 1965) was "to get a bigger hammer."

to go back to the threat title, North Korea and Darfur are dicey as shit and there aint really shit that any of us can do about, aside from letting more and more folks know about what's going on, and to try to apply pressure to elected officials to work peaceably(if possible) at it. oh yeah, and to also insure that the officials elected aren't the kinda folks to go off and invade at a multi-faceted whim.

when you have so many politicos who waver with whichever way the wind blows, then you can go about changing the direction of the air currents, as it were.

kingfish completely hatstand (Kingfish), Thursday, 11 August 2005 05:53 (eighteen years ago) link

Gareth!

You do seem to be avoiding (or maybe I missed your response to) the point that Iraq isn't a typical situation, that it's one where more or less everything that could be bungled has been.

Also, have you been drinking? You sound like you're moderately to quite drunk, but all the letters in your words are in the right order.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 11 August 2005 06:27 (eighteen years ago) link

of course it works both ways, but we're not talking about what 'they' should be doing, here? we're talkign about what 'we' should or shouldnt be doing?

its getting dangerously close to us and them, on this thread isnt it? and thats the danger, going in for humanitarian reasons, doesnt really tally with "us and them", especially if 'they' dont think right? a

again, was it justified for vietnam to invade cambodia to take out the khymer rouge? why or why not?

well, we're now talking about non-american/western forces? also we're talking then about a threat on the doorstep. im not really arguing against war per se at all, and i'm sure the vietnamese went in there as much for security reasons as for 'humanitarian' reasons. but the crux of the matter is, this thread isnt really for condemning or praising the actions of other states, this thread is about the actions of our own nations

and as for iraq, i thought i had said i dont believe it to be a 'special case'. i think any action in iran would be equally disastrous, for the same reasons, and sudan, syria, libya all have similarities. although, yes, i agree, that in principle, all situations are special cases with unique circumstances

i'd be more inclined to argue that its actually north korea that is the special case though

charltonlido (gareth), Thursday, 11 August 2005 07:13 (eighteen years ago) link

and, its my view that even if everything hadnt been bungled, we'd be facing many of the same problems there as before. (saddam, in a way, is paradoxically an irrelevant, - the west put him in and backed him, the west took him out when they got bored of him, conflation of saddam with west among many, after all he was their stooge) - hardly a special case as the world is littered with western stooges we put there

charltonlido (gareth), Thursday, 11 August 2005 07:15 (eighteen years ago) link

has anyone read ignatieff's empire lite?

charltonlido (gareth), Monday, 15 August 2005 13:58 (eighteen years ago) link

seven years pass...

Dennis Rodman, in cap, and his traveling companions are now the only Americans known to have met the North Korean leader since he took power more than a year ago.

your fretless ways (Eazy), Saturday, 2 March 2013 06:54 (eleven years ago) link

five months pass...

whole thing is o_O but

Kim Chol was reportedly executed for drinking and carousing during the official mourning period after Kim Jong-il's death.

On the explicit orders of Kim Jong-un to leave "no trace of him behind, down to his hair," according to South Korean media, Kim Chol was forced to stand on a spot that had been zeroed in for a mortar round and "obliterated."

brownie, Friday, 30 August 2013 13:46 (ten years ago) link

North Korea: still hilarious

how's life, Friday, 30 August 2013 14:27 (ten years ago) link

I mean, this was probably the more appropriate thread....

how's life, Friday, 30 August 2013 14:27 (ten years ago) link

ten months pass...

Dear Leader by Jang Jin-Sung should be a compelling read, he is the former N Korean propagandist who defected to S Korea in 2004.

festival of labour (xelab), Monday, 7 July 2014 18:14 (nine years ago) link

Jang Jin-sung held one of the most senior ranks in North Korea's propaganda machine, helping tighten the regime's grip over its people. Among his tasks were developing the founding myth of North Korea, posing undercover as a South Korean intellectual and writing epic poems in support of the dictator, Kim Jong-il.

festival of labour (xelab), Monday, 7 July 2014 18:15 (nine years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.