― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Huckle-Buck (Horace Mann), Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:08 (twenty-two years ago)
I think Hill has no comprehension whatsoever of WHY the word "nigger" is offensive in that context. I can only put this down to three possible scenarios -
1. he has had his head in the clouds for the past thirty years. 2. he is an idiot.3. both.
To blame his generation or upbringing into it seems disigenuous to me.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:19 (twenty-two years ago)
But it all hinges on what 'making moral judgments' and 'taking into account' means. These kind of issues tend to get bogged down in problems of language, and as such are probably best dealt with by continental philosophers who pick over language rather than radio phone ins. The repetititiveness of the arguments does my head in a bit.
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:54 (twenty-two years ago)
but, what about contextualization? i think it helps us to place things in context, and understand why people say and do different things etc.
or, to put it another way, there was a level of shock and disappointment about atkinsons behaviour, but what if ryan giggs had said it?
― gareth (gareth), Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 13 May 2004 14:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 13 May 2004 15:01 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm amazed and intrigued.
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 13 May 2004 15:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 13 May 2004 15:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 13 May 2004 15:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Paul Kelly (kelly), Friday, 14 May 2004 02:59 (twenty-two years ago)