welcome to the cultural revolution (aka what the FUCK is wrong with the florida legislature?)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (313 of them)
This thread is the perfect illustration of how the radical right will hijack a discussion, re-frame the debate toward their own ends and successfully shift attention away from the real issues that are at stake.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Friday, 25 March 2005 01:34 (nineteen years ago) link

no man, God is pushing this thread towards the Truth! I can feel it!

Father Brown and the Shroud of Turin, Friday, 25 March 2005 01:36 (nineteen years ago) link

the real issues that are at stake are?

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 25 March 2005 01:36 (nineteen years ago) link

Tery Schiavo.

Matt Chesnut, Friday, 25 March 2005 01:38 (nineteen years ago) link

Terry, even.

Matt Chesnut, Friday, 25 March 2005 01:40 (nineteen years ago) link

the real issue is the ability of idiots like you being able to sue your professors.

Father Brown and the Shroud of Turin, Friday, 25 March 2005 01:43 (nineteen years ago) link

the real issue is the ability of idiots like you to sue your professors.

whoops double-post

Father Brown and the Shroud of Turin, Friday, 25 March 2005 01:43 (nineteen years ago) link

alex the point i wz hyper-dramatising wz the given rationale BEHIND saying "we won't talk about that now" - i haven't a clue what the US academic rules are about whether teachers can physically kick pupils out, but that's not what i'm getting at (BOTH my teachers kicked their pupils out, but just shutting them up wd have made the same point)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 March 2005 01:44 (nineteen years ago) link

I've mentioned a few times above that getting lawyers involved is probably a bad idea.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 25 March 2005 01:46 (nineteen years ago) link

well then maybe you should work on reigning in some of your fellow "Biblical Christians" before they turn into "totalitarian dictators"... or maybe you should give some thought as to why you share a belief system with people who would legislate such a thing....

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 March 2005 01:47 (nineteen years ago) link

The real issue is avoiding the situation of “one biased view by the professor, who as a dictator controls the classroom,” as part of “a misuse of their platform to indoctrinate the next generation with their own views.”

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 25 March 2005 01:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Well then maybe you should work on reigning in some of your fellow "Biblical Christians" before they turn into "totalitarian dictators."

That might be what I do, but I'm still not too good at articulating things so I need to learn more first.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 25 March 2005 01:50 (nineteen years ago) link

one of the reasons this is still a live issue is that what's at stake over evolution doesn't seem to be particularly concrete

(unlike the flatness or otherwise of the world) (the ppl who are still convinced of this are unlikely to be hired to operate in all kinds of key industries: but no one much is likely to die or lose money if evolution turns out to be wrong) (the moment this is demonstrably not so, then the debate will dwindle)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 March 2005 01:50 (nineteen years ago) link

i have to say i think that that view of classrooms is more a projection of how those who say it would run classrooms themselves, than how most of them are run (except ones in movies where the professor is played by john houseman)

ie it's pretty much totally a bogus problem, and the legislation being proposed takes the judgment out away from the one place it can reasonably be made, which is IN the classroom itself (by the congregation collectively present)

ie if ALL the pupils think this, then it's probably so: if only one of them thinks this, it probably isn't

trolls vs moderators on ilx being an opposite parallel

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 March 2005 01:55 (nineteen years ago) link

nairn how many times have you been kicked out of the classroom for challenging your professor? what were these professor's names?

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 25 March 2005 01:57 (nineteen years ago) link

and you still didn't answer my questions

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 25 March 2005 01:57 (nineteen years ago) link

Meeting this challenge to liberal education and the Socratic method with haughty disdain for the intelligence of David Horowitz & Co. is exactly what those resentment-mongers count on. The championing of the Bible by many people is their way--however ultimately pacifying--of rebelling against the status quo. Many, many students feel intimidated by their fancifully educated, upper crust instructors, obviously privileged (unless you disagree and subscribe to some sort of romantic theory of genius that just happens to favor the well-heeled) in ways the "conservative" (read "rural") student will never enjoy. These are the ones our public education system ostensibly was established to enlighten; insulting their beliefs or the beliefs of their parents is not the smartest way to go about reaching them. I don't know what the solution would be if this threat ever gets serious (which it won't, I bet), but high-handed sarcasm and Bible jokes probably isn't it.

Professor Pushover, Friday, 25 March 2005 02:00 (nineteen years ago) link

also, and this is based purely on my very limited experience, but the notion that the power in the classroom rests with the professor and not the students is hardly the case in american universities and colleges presently. quite the opposite, disturbingly so.

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:01 (nineteen years ago) link

um, i'm a "rural" student

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:03 (nineteen years ago) link

anairn has done this sort of thread derailing before -- and almost ALWAYS when the thread is criticizing conservatives. he's like roger adultery, only sneakier and more passive-aggressive.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:03 (nineteen years ago) link

and worse spelling

Shmool McShmool (shmuel), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:05 (nineteen years ago) link

insulting is bad, no disagreement. but insulting =/= challenging!

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:05 (nineteen years ago) link

i think prof pushover's class analysis is a bit over-simplified (maybe to make a point clearly): the 60s of course saw a huge rise in the proportion of the NON well-heeled in tertiary education throughout the western world, and while this has fallen back quite a bit it's nowhere near fallen back to the levels of even the 50s - and many teaching now came precisely from this intake

(also i wd rather give up the socratic method entirely than put a crimp in my disdain for the intelligence of david horowitz)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:07 (nineteen years ago) link

david horowitz isn't exactly a country rube, to say the fucking least

Shmool McShmool (shmuel), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:09 (nineteen years ago) link

James, I didn't mean to suggest that all rural students are dopey conservatives.

About the power dynamic, thing, too, you might be somewhat heartened to know that your experience is not universal. Cue Snap: "I've got the power." But that's because I respect my students, even those ign'ant conservative Christians. If anything, the main "problems" I've seen in classrooms involve kids having too much fun--still hungover, the occassional ones obviously stoned, etc.--but that's part of the college experience, so I work around that. Teaching's fun, believe it or not, and the fun party kids (who skew conservative, strangely) can be a good time.

Professor Pushover, Friday, 25 March 2005 02:10 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm probably a better speller than anthony.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:10 (nineteen years ago) link

haha THAT'S SETTING THE BAR REAL HIGH!!

(sorry anthony)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:12 (nineteen years ago) link

"nairn how many times have you been kicked out of the classroom for challenging your professor? what were these professor's names?"

not personally, but I have kept silent when a professor has been going on about something that was completely contradictor to my belief.

"nairn has done this sort of thread derailing before -- and almost ALWAYS when the thread is criticizing conservatives. he's like roger adultery, only sneakier and more passive-aggressive."

It's not when the thread is criticizing conservatives, but when the thread criticizes Biblical Christianity.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:13 (nineteen years ago) link

I've kept silent when my Popular Music in American Culture prof said disco died. Just let it slide.

Matt Chesnut, Friday, 25 March 2005 02:14 (nineteen years ago) link

it kinda got lost in the midst of all this what-the-fuck-is-anairn-on-about? on this thread, but socratic method teaching seems to be good for one thing -- teaching students to argue and back up their statements (ergo, its widespread use in american law schools). where it is NOT good (or, more precisely, where it was not good for ME) is that it's pretty lousy in instructing the students in the subject matter purportedly being taught -- it's pretty inefficient and roundabout. and again, to get back to law school (sorry to bore, but this is where i have first-hand knowledge) -- all of the verbal socratic acrobatics was largely useless come exam-time, where you were expected to issue-spot and apply "black-letter law" and if you went "socratic" on an exam you would kill precious time and space and GET A SHITTY GRADE.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:14 (nineteen years ago) link

but you got yr revenge on the dancefloor that very night!!

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:15 (nineteen years ago) link

I criticize the lack of openess to the Biblical Christian worldview among some of society and the apparent hypocracy of that segment of society when they want openess for whatever view they hold.

A Nairn (moretap), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:16 (nineteen years ago) link

I LET IT ELECTRIC SLIDE!

Matt Chesnut, Friday, 25 March 2005 02:16 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm probably a better speller than anthony.

yer on a par spelling-wise w/ hanle y -- though NOT in terms of wit (unless yer whole series of posts is a gigantic leg-pull, in which case you've out hanle y'ed hanle y wr2 amusing incoherence!)

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:16 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah for the maths part of my degree i don't think we did ANY socratic method (but i guess maths is all received facts until you reach doctorate level)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:18 (nineteen years ago) link

i thought the highest level of um, the tertiary in the american colleges was post-wwii via gi bill ie. how this tertiary is in college right now.


haha actually the one time i've had a john houseman type prof was this EXTREMELY conservative who tended to dismiss my liberal objections to whatever she was on about that day (eg. that the liberal media didn't give the janet jackson brouhaha the attention it deserved)(my persecution drawing response: 'are you fucking kidding me???'). ego-mad professors exist but pretending there's a correlation between ego and ideology seems quite suspect to me and even here i suspect persecution at most = not being patted on the head or agreed with, god (sorry God) forbid. i'm not even sure there's any relation between openminded/humble teacher = good teacher. certainly not the case in boot camp at least.

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:18 (nineteen years ago) link

dear god hypocrisy must be about the most overrated and overprosecuted crime in america today. and nairn you're really not the person to be prosecuting (or persecuting!) it.

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:22 (nineteen years ago) link

(well if so say 50s when i said 60s, and 40s when i said 50s, james: the bulge in the UK is certainly more the 60s than the 50s)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:23 (nineteen years ago) link

classrooms aren't generally meant to be open-forum discussions, all as equals: when did conservatives starts arguing THIS!!?

(the last bit's rhetorical) (though a date wd be entertaining)

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:25 (nineteen years ago) link

Mark S, my analysis is oversimplified. And "high culture" on the whole, the academy included, has grown more egalitarian since the miraculous 60s. But still, there's a way higher percentage of people engaged in graduate studies whose parents have the means to buy them houses while they get their PhDs than there are in our armed forces. Students notice, too, believe it or not.

Professor Pushover, Friday, 25 March 2005 02:26 (nineteen years ago) link

yeah pp otm there

j blount (papa la bas), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:27 (nineteen years ago) link

I just want to hear all these right wing X-tian teachers that are getting harrassed for expressing their opinions

um, there's an article about "jesus in the classroom" from last week's new yorker about this guy in silicon valley...

does it bother any so-called christians, biblical or otherwise, that using a word like "persecution" in regards to having one's belief challenge completely debases the term? like, y'know, how having a professor challenge your beliefs is NOTHING like being set ablaze, gored by lions, or crucified?

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:29 (nineteen years ago) link

gored by lions? don't you mean unicorns?

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:30 (nineteen years ago) link

they didn't exist, noahmark s.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:31 (nineteen years ago) link

and yeah, i'm specifically referring to the persecution of early xians by the romans, which makes the complaints of a nairn and his ilk look like the whiny bullshit it is.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:32 (nineteen years ago) link

thus proving evolution, though true, sucks

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:33 (nineteen years ago) link

Students notice, too, believe it or not.

ergo, this thread ----> Trustafarianism ... and THIS thread ----> defend the indefensible: THE IVY LEAGUE

Eisbär (llamasfur), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:34 (nineteen years ago) link

proving devolution maybe? devo was right!

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:35 (nineteen years ago) link

bow down to your new god:

http://www.synthfool.com/maw/booji.jpg

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:36 (nineteen years ago) link

it wz an x-post really (i wz mourning the unicorn) but it worked even better as a devo ref!!

mark s (mark s), Friday, 25 March 2005 02:36 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.