Thanks. Bests.
― Matt B (aerial1), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 09:16 (twenty years ago)
― Theorry Henry (Enrique), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 09:21 (twenty years ago)
― dewd, Tuesday, 17 January 2006 10:21 (twenty years ago)
― leigh (leigh), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 11:20 (twenty years ago)
― Vicious Cop Kills Gentle Fool (Dada), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 11:22 (twenty years ago)
― Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 11:24 (twenty years ago)
― Vicious Cop Kills Gentle Fool (Dada), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 11:33 (twenty years ago)
― Matt B (aerial1), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 11:47 (twenty years ago)
― Last Of The Famous International Pfunkboys (Kerr), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 12:04 (twenty years ago)
― joan vich (joan vich), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 12:18 (twenty years ago)
― NickB (NickB), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 12:26 (twenty years ago)
― NickB (NickB), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 12:28 (twenty years ago)
― ambrose (ambrose), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 15:31 (twenty years ago)
I'm guilty of skimming the "Critical Beats" then putting it back on the shelf most of the time...
― mike h. (mike h.), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 17:08 (twenty years ago)
nothing unreasonable there!
― don't start a RYE-OTT! (plsmith), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 17:09 (twenty years ago)
Are white people who say "I don't like hip hop" yet listen to it when white people make it really saying "i don't like black people"?
― ,, Tuesday, 17 January 2006 17:13 (twenty years ago)
That's the one still probably hanging around in some shops now. It's not one of his best pieces.
― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:34 (twenty years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 17 January 2006 18:36 (twenty years ago)
Perhaps it's time to revoke the canonical status of persistent underachievers such as Callahan and Will Oldham (don't even get me started on Iron & Wine and Bright Eyes) and banish them to ILX for good, diverting our attention more fulsomely towards artists with genuinely inquisitive approaches to traditional songform, whether this means James Blake and Jamie Woon or Alex Tucker and Richard Youngs.
^ weird thing in a Bill Callahan review in the new issue
― ka£ka (NickB), Sunday, 20 March 2011 00:11 (fifteen years ago)
Whoa that is weird. Who wrote that?
― Mark, Sunday, 20 March 2011 00:15 (fifteen years ago)
Joseph Stannard
― ka£ka (NickB), Sunday, 20 March 2011 00:16 (fifteen years ago)
What does ILX mean to the average Wire reader?
Is the general perception of ILX that it's the place that old indie guys go to to die?
lol Bright Eyes?
― ka£ka (NickB), Sunday, 20 March 2011 00:22 (fifteen years ago)
tf? doesn't this cunt realize shit like
James Blake and Jamie Woon or Alex Tucker and Richard Youngs.
is far more popular on ilx than his placeholder indie bros
― kid 606: the nultness (nakhchivan), Sunday, 20 March 2011 01:16 (fifteen years ago)
Hahaha, I am going to kick his ass. Especially as most of those guys are shit (Youngs a notable exception). Much love for Joe, though.
― emil.y, Sunday, 20 March 2011 01:20 (fifteen years ago)
lol 'inquisitive approaches to songform' - what they mean, of course, is 'can't write a real song' (Youngs excepted). I love how the brits still think that effects pedal demonstrations are somehow cutting edge, and the practitioners of this insufferable trend (umm, pretty much everyone after Roy Montgomery) are more worthy of attention than artists who can, you know, write a decent tune. Any asshole can buy a Memory Man. Nobody but Callahan could have written "Sometimes I Feel Like The Mother Of The World." What a dipshit.
― If Assholes Could Fly This Place Would Be An Airport, Sunday, 20 March 2011 02:10 (fifteen years ago)
Actually, I highly doubt that's what he means at all, and I can vouch for JS being pretty kick-ass knowledgeable about 'inquisitive approaches to songform', I'm just not sure why he chose those people, particularly in a publication like the Wire where you should be given carte blanche to name-check much more interesting artists. The main thing I boggle at is his very odd perception of ILx. I'm also uncertain about why 'classic' songwriting has to be discarded at the same time as the 'new' is embraced, but I'm guessing he intends it more as a charge of being boring rather than necessarily being retrogressive, which is his right as a reviewer, even if he may be wrong in certain instances.
― emil.y, Sunday, 20 March 2011 02:18 (fifteen years ago)
Well put. I just can't get behind a dude who probably thinks Willie Nelson is 'boring' and jams Grouper albums on road trips.
― If Assholes Could Fly This Place Would Be An Airport, Sunday, 20 March 2011 02:29 (fifteen years ago)
Ha, I know you meant that to agree with me, but I am the kind of dude who thinks Willie Nelson is boring and jams Grouper albums on road trips. (Actually nothing against Nelson but man, I adore Grouper.)
― emil.y, Sunday, 20 March 2011 02:35 (fifteen years ago)
LOL. Grouper was the first example I could think of.
― If Assholes Could Fly This Place Would Be An Airport, Sunday, 20 March 2011 02:47 (fifteen years ago)
I hope I'm never forced into a Sophie's Choice moment between Willie Nelson and Grouper.
The weird thing about it (besides the ILX reference) is that Bill and Will simply aren't making the same kind of music as those other people, so I don't know why you'd bother bringing it up in a review. I like Joe's writing lots but this seems like a bit of a 'why isn't X more like Y' refusal to engage with something in its own terms, which is rarely productive or fun.
― Antoine Bugleboy (Merdeyeux), Sunday, 20 March 2011 03:01 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe someone should post the whole review. I'm assuming it's for Apocalypse and I'm assuming it's pretty negative?
― If Assholes Could Fly This Place Would Be An Airport, Sunday, 20 March 2011 03:15 (fifteen years ago)
In what sense do Callahan and Oldham 'underachieve'? I quite liked either of them at various points, but the wire's job is to cover people who didn't quite achieve (in a very clear 'at the wrong place and time' sense).
Surprised the editor didn't ask about ILX (he/she probably knew but really do the readership know.) Liked the way the mention was dropped in so casually, as if there is no distinction between print and what goes on in the web.
― xyzzzz__, Sunday, 20 March 2011 08:42 (fifteen years ago)
Joe is a good dude iirc but yeah something that would make sense to a maximum of one human being living on the planet earth should maybe have been caught by a subeditor
(ha I wrote that before reading the post above)
― I only use this style of type when I choose it (DJ Mencap), Sunday, 20 March 2011 11:43 (fifteen years ago)
Jamie Woon? For fuck's sake...
"The Brits"? What in Criven's name are you talking about?
― Chap With Wings... Five Rounds Rapid (Doran), Sunday, 20 March 2011 13:21 (fifteen years ago)
Trying not to be a dick but the above quote only makes sense as a dig at the Mountain Goats
― I may be wrong but I think his name is Husher (Drugs A. Money), Sunday, 20 March 2011 14:43 (fifteen years ago)
(By which I mean, maybe he thinks Oldham and Callahan should take a break from music and become ILM regulars)(I know that's not what J0hn did, but...)
― I may be wrong but I think his name is Husher (Drugs A. Money), Sunday, 20 March 2011 14:52 (fifteen years ago)
aside from the fact that even that reading only takes it a ball-hair way from meaninglessness, that basically splits the prospective readership of the review into two camps, one who won't understand it at all and one who'll understand it but find it annoying
― I only use this style of type when I choose it (DJ Mencap), Sunday, 20 March 2011 14:58 (fifteen years ago)
Critical wtfs aside, the guy doesn't know what the word "fulsomely" means, I think he means "fully".
― Neil S, Sunday, 20 March 2011 16:16 (fifteen years ago)
Usage Note: Fulsome is often used to mean "offensively flattering or insincere." But the word is also used, particularly in the expression fulsome praise, to mean simply "abundant," without any implication of excess or insincerity. This usage is etymologically justified but may invite misunderstandings in contexts in which a deprecatory interpretation could be made. The sentence I offer you my most fulsome apologies may raise an eyebrow, where the use of an adjective like full or abundant would leave no room for doubt as to the sincerity of the speaker's intentions.
― emil.y, Sunday, 20 March 2011 16:31 (fifteen years ago)
what a spiteful review that is.
― i love it when a suggest ban comes together (cajunsunday), Sunday, 20 March 2011 16:51 (fifteen years ago)
xp okay looks like I was being a bit pedantic, no doubt an internet first!
― Neil S, Sunday, 20 March 2011 16:56 (fifteen years ago)
If only Bill Callahan had the sense to go glitch years ago! At this point, his only future clearly lies in embracing UK funky.
― Dare, Sunday, 20 March 2011 18:22 (fifteen years ago)
Can't believe I didn't notice this - kind of hilarious that ILX is understood as any kind of common reference in the Wireverse and that it's completely off the mark wrt what goes on here.
Rest of the review isn't any more fairminded btw - one paragraph focuses on how Bill Callahan is a "charmless tranquilised version" of Howe Gelb ("the comparion bears analysis" is a representatively vacuous statement).
Love The Wire anyway.
― No more war/No more hate/Got my girl swag on/Got my girl swag on (seandalai), Sunday, 20 March 2011 19:00 (fifteen years ago)
that basically splits the prospective readership of the review into two camps, one who won't understand it at all and one who'll understand it but find it annoying
not sure about that, I understand it and pretty much agree with it fwiw
― ban this sick stunt (anagram), Sunday, 20 March 2011 19:12 (fifteen years ago)
Jesus Christ. Can someone post this review in full? Sounds like the most lol 0_O review ever.
Howe Gelb? Come on. I love Giant Sand, but...come on. Howe's written some great songs, but...
― If Assholes Could Fly This Place Would Be An Airport, Sunday, 20 March 2011 19:13 (fifteen years ago)
xp you think Bill Callahan should be forced to post to ILX?
― I only use this style of type when I choose it (DJ Mencap), Sunday, 20 March 2011 19:16 (fifteen years ago)
I have enjoyed his music on occasion but I don't get the impression he'd bring much to our table
― I only use this style of type when I choose it (DJ Mencap), Sunday, 20 March 2011 19:17 (fifteen years ago)
Ah, you don't know about the secret I Love Bill Callahan board?
― No more war/No more hate/Got my girl swag on/Got my girl swag on (seandalai), Sunday, 20 March 2011 19:30 (fifteen years ago)
when will this billcallahanisation of ILX end
― I only use this style of type when I choose it (DJ Mencap), Sunday, 20 March 2011 19:33 (fifteen years ago)
He still can't draw vaginas.
― Fig On A Plate Cart (Alex in SF), Friday, 8 April 2011 12:27 (fifteen years ago)
an alternate version of the April issue -
http://www.blrrecords.com/img/wire.jpg
.....about time Fuckstep is back in vogue.
― (I Just) Died In Your Asshat Tonight, Saturday, 9 April 2011 03:31 (fifteen years ago)
First WIRE I bought had DJ Shadow on the cover IIRC. And its relatively peerless in terms of music magazines with re-read value... the number of times I've been digging something that they've written about a year/years ago = numerous.
― Feelin' Like A Ghost / No Swayze (Craigo Boingo), Saturday, 9 April 2011 04:33 (fifteen years ago)
haw
― The Geirogeirgegege (nakhchivan), Saturday, 9 April 2011 13:40 (fifteen years ago)
lol letters page
― /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ (zappi), Monday, 11 April 2011 18:30 (fifteen years ago)
what's in it?
― Algerian Goalkeeper, Monday, 11 April 2011 22:11 (fifteen years ago)
ilx honour defended
― /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ (zappi), Monday, 11 April 2011 22:25 (fifteen years ago)
Who by? Could you please type it out? The Wire's not out until thursday.
― Algerian Goalkeeper, Monday, 11 April 2011 22:27 (fifteen years ago)
someone called Nilmar Da Silva? just a jokey letter about that Bill Callahan review.
― /人 ◕ ‿‿ ◕人\ (zappi), Monday, 11 April 2011 22:34 (fifteen years ago)
tbh a cursory look at site new answers right now would probably support the idea that ilx is a den of drag city guy worship
― your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Tuesday, 12 April 2011 18:32 (fifteen years ago)
when was it ever not?
― Algerian Goalkeeper, Tuesday, 12 April 2011 18:35 (fifteen years ago)
i liked that famous funeral song by smog. that's about it. that was worthy enough to be a country song. like, i could imagine tom t. hall writing it.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 12 April 2011 18:37 (fifteen years ago)
May I object to Joseph Stannard's characterisation of internet forum ILX in his review of Bill Callahan's Apocalypse as a haven for over-aged singer-songwriters and fans of confessional indie types. ILX is a broad and agreeably heterodox church, open even to Burzum ans, but we really hate that shit.Nilmar Da Silva, London
Anyone willing to own up?
― Stars of the Lidl (seandalai), Tuesday, 12 April 2011 21:59 (fifteen years ago)
Uh, "Burzum fans" obv.
― Stars of the Lidl (seandalai), Tuesday, 12 April 2011 22:00 (fifteen years ago)
l0u1s jagg3r
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 12 April 2011 22:01 (fifteen years ago)
didn't tom d used to write to the wire years and years ago?
― Algerian Goalkeeper, Tuesday, 12 April 2011 22:11 (fifteen years ago)
not that i'm saying he wrote that, but lols at the letter
― Algerian Goalkeeper, Tuesday, 12 April 2011 22:12 (fifteen years ago)
haha
― Future Debts Collector (Le Bateau Ivre), Tuesday, 12 April 2011 22:15 (fifteen years ago)
A+
― jed_, Tuesday, 12 April 2011 22:15 (fifteen years ago)
not actually true that "we really hate that shit" though is it, as sclump says there is far more love on ILM for those types than there is for Richard Youngs. as such Stannard has a point
― ban this sick stunt (anagram), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 08:13 (fifteen years ago)
"Nilmar da Silva". I'd look to the I Love Football board for the culprit. Either that or he is Brazilian.
― Tom D (Tom D.), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 08:20 (fifteen years ago)
there's far more love everywhere for Bill C than for Richard Youngs so i don't really see his point.
― jed_, Wednesday, 13 April 2011 10:46 (fifteen years ago)
I am guessing that it was Xyzzz who wrote that.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 13 April 2011 10:49 (fifteen years ago)
there's far more love everywhere for Bill C than for Richard Youngs
Not at the Wire obviously, Richard Youngs seems to have replaced Derek Bailey in their affections
― Tom D (Tom D.), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 10:54 (fifteen years ago)
yeah i don't know, i think the objectionable part wasn't ilxors-like-smog, like they are bland, mojo-reading nostalgists, but the idea that such whitebread staples were worthless on account of their mundane traditional songforms, that paying attention to guys who release boring solo guitar cd-rs is intellectually more worthwhile & daring
― your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 11:22 (fifteen years ago)
I don't really have much to say about Richard Youngs other than I saw him live once, supporting the Pastels possibly (could that be true?) and he so annoyed me I've avoided him and his works ever since, and that's a rare experience
― Tom D (Tom D.), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 11:30 (fifteen years ago)
Wait, what was the OG review?
My guess is nakh.
― popular gay automobile (a hoy hoy), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 11:40 (fifteen years ago)
Football reference points that way
― Tom D (Tom D.), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 11:42 (fifteen years ago)
nakh doesn't read the wire iirc
― Algerian Goalkeeper, Wednesday, 13 April 2011 12:52 (fifteen years ago)
I like Richard Youngs a lot but I've never seen him live. Could imagine him being pretty annoying if the setting wasn't right.
― ridic beau (NickB), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 13:17 (fifteen years ago)
juli0 des0uza
nilmar dasilva
hmmmm
― amphetamine fueled scholar (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 17:55 (fifteen years ago)
Vandalism LiarAdmiral AnvilsSimilar Vandal Drama VillainsDisarm VanillaInvalid Alarms
― it's time for the fish in the perculator (Steve Shasta), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 18:13 (fifteen years ago)
'disarm vanilla' is p good
― amphetamine fueled scholar (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 13 April 2011 18:18 (fifteen years ago)
dont suppose there is a scan/archive copy of the interview with mark fell in the july issue this year going about
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 20 September 2015 15:24 (ten years ago)
many thanks to a certain scottish ilm poster
― nakhchivan, Sunday, 20 September 2015 15:31 (ten years ago)
touch of the noodle vagues about that fell cover
― the siteban for the hilarious 'lbzc' dom ips (wins), Sunday, 20 September 2015 15:43 (ten years ago)
nah
― Cosmic Slop, Sunday, 20 September 2015 15:54 (ten years ago)
he's smiling for a start!
Derek Walmsley is stepping down as editor. Also, the new issue is a double, covering January and February. I’ve been subscribing since the turn of the millennium and it’s always been a monthly. No mention of the publishing schedule in the editor’s note.
― Tapioca by Jean Sibelius (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 5 December 2023 18:47 (two years ago)
My subscribers copy came with a sheet saying we would get our next issue Feb 24th
― Toshirō Nofune (The Seventh ILXorai), Tuesday, 5 December 2023 18:51 (two years ago)
2nd Feb 2024, I meant
― Toshirō Nofune (The Seventh ILXorai), Tuesday, 5 December 2023 18:52 (two years ago)
Ah, I’m a digital subscriber.
― Tapioca by Jean Sibelius (Boring, Maryland), Tuesday, 5 December 2023 19:06 (two years ago)
Is the new issue an end of the year charts one?
― djh, Tuesday, 5 December 2023 21:50 (two years ago)
It is.
― The Triumphant Return of Bernard & Stubbs (Raymond Cummings), Tuesday, 5 December 2023 21:51 (two years ago)
yes, this is the front cover
The Wire 2023 Rewind issue is out now! https://t.co/LeGoOooML6This special bumper issue inc Releases of the Year, Critics’ Reflections, Columnists’ Charts, Essays & Analyses. Plus: Linton Kwesi Johnson, Fred Frith, Laetitia Sadier, Mariam Rezaei, pages of reviews and much more. pic.twitter.com/eoraNt0sx3— The Wire Magazine (@thewiremagazine) December 5, 2023
― djmartian, Tuesday, 5 December 2023 21:51 (two years ago)
I guess it was inevitable in these economic times but I liked that they powered ahead with monthly issues for so long.
― Tapioca by Jean Sibelius (Boring, Maryland), Wednesday, 6 December 2023 01:05 (two years ago)
Seems like the next one is a regular one-month issue? Perhaps they needed a buffer month to sort out who’ll be steering the ship from here on out, as I didn’t see a ’new editor’ announcement.
― wronger than 100 geir posts (MacDara), Wednesday, 6 December 2023 19:43 (two years ago)
The February issue is always just a bunch of playing catchup with late 2023 stuff + also trying to figure out what to even write about because release schedules don't even ramp up until March. It's a smart move on their part.
― The SoyBoy West Coast (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 6 December 2023 19:58 (two years ago)
interviews for editor start at the end of next week
wire routinely ran with a dec/jan double issue up till the mid-90s
― mark s, Wednesday, 6 December 2023 20:10 (two years ago)
I was thinking this wasn't the first time they'd done it, but I only went back a few years in the online archive so didn't see the most recent one before now.
Very curious who the new editor will be. Derek was promoted from within (he'd been reviews editor) but I guess Joe Stannard (current reviews editor) and/or Emily Bick (current front-of-book and website editor) don't want to move up the ladder?
― Tahuti Watches L&O:SVU Reruns Without His Ape (unperson), Wednesday, 6 December 2023 20:12 (two years ago)