Shouldn't we all be protesting the war in Iraq?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
On some sort of regular basis?

Ian John50n (orion), Sunday, 28 August 2005 19:56 (twenty years ago)

I'm avoiding the draft.

Adam In Real Life (nordicskilla), Sunday, 28 August 2005 20:11 (twenty years ago)

i secretly want to be drafted, sometimes

caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Sunday, 28 August 2005 20:18 (twenty years ago)

protest is played out.

vahid (vahid), Sunday, 28 August 2005 20:20 (twenty years ago)

i want to do a hunger strike

caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Sunday, 28 August 2005 20:21 (twenty years ago)

i secretly want to be drafted, sometimes

oh, you'd make an amazing soldier, caitlin.

Adam In Real Life (nordicskilla), Sunday, 28 August 2005 20:22 (twenty years ago)

i'd ride into baghdad on my magical lion?

caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Sunday, 28 August 2005 20:23 (twenty years ago)

I don't think protest is played out. It will never get an evil brick wall of a person that's in POWER to change his mind, but I think when you start to see it more en masse, when it's not just the usual suspects out there, it can affect the general public consciousness, at least.

Ian is right, I think.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 28 August 2005 20:27 (twenty years ago)

i'd ride into baghdad on my magical lion?

yes. that would be so good.

Adam In Real Life (nordicskilla), Sunday, 28 August 2005 20:27 (twenty years ago)

fuck the easily contented american youth.

Ian John50n (orion), Sunday, 28 August 2005 20:27 (twenty years ago)

Also: almost every other country in the world would hate us less if they began to see regular news images of more masses of us taking it out on the streets.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 28 August 2005 20:28 (twenty years ago)

I marched against the war in London, wasn't that the biggest public protest ever?

Adam In Real Life (nordicskilla), Sunday, 28 August 2005 20:32 (twenty years ago)

see, governments don't remember shit. it has to be on REGULARLY. this is my new sincere belief.

Ian John50n (orion), Sunday, 28 August 2005 20:33 (twenty years ago)

http://www.soulincode.com/images/YELLOW.jpg

amon (eman), Sunday, 28 August 2005 20:34 (twenty years ago)

i agree, people should care a lot more. not just about the war, either. everything is bad. niger, for example, what the fuck

caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Sunday, 28 August 2005 20:41 (twenty years ago)

sorry: i don't mean to say "protest" is played out.

"marching in the streets" is played out.

it's not disruptive or even thought-provoking anymore - it is very easy for people to file picket lines away in their heads, prob under the heading of "60s relics" / "losers".

vahid (vahid), Sunday, 28 August 2005 20:46 (twenty years ago)

picket lines vs. thousands of people marching down major commercial centers.

Ian John50n (orion), Sunday, 28 August 2005 20:50 (twenty years ago)

I see what you're saying, but what about when the entire center of a city is totally blocked off due to angry people of all ages? It's still not often going to do anything, but as a large public statement it's a pretty bold one.

xp exactly! The London one was pretty undeniable.

Adam In Real Life (nordicskilla), Sunday, 28 August 2005 20:51 (twenty years ago)

the problem is most 21st century american cities no longer have communal public space (by design, often! see: every university of california campus built since the late 1960s) so it's no longer an effective tactic.

vahid (vahid), Sunday, 28 August 2005 21:07 (twenty years ago)

the wave of the future = norman mailer's "armies of the night".
100,000 protestors march down on the pentagon, only to end up as an isolated mob cordoned off in america's biggest parking lot.

this sort of tactic works best where it's not needed = london, new york, paris, chicago, san francisco, etc.

how to take protest to simi valley? to the walmarts and gated communities?

vahid (vahid), Sunday, 28 August 2005 21:10 (twenty years ago)

Yes, but what about requiring registration on ILE?

pr00de descending a staircase (pr00de), Sunday, 28 August 2005 21:26 (twenty years ago)

The problem is that we need it to be a serious shut the fuckn' country down massive event for those in power to pay attention. The government is going to laugh and say so what if a few hundred thousdand hippies have a march, but if millions of people give the middle finger to George by not buying gas, staying home from work and not spending any $$ to make the US economy stand still (at home) for a couple for a weeks. Are there enough people out there who would be willing to do this ?? We all know the answer to that one. So untill then it seems that were pretty screwed unless your of the mindset that the baby Jesus says Mr. Bush will keep you safe so everything is allright.

brg30 (brg30), Sunday, 28 August 2005 21:27 (twenty years ago)

i think ian is right... "played" as it may be

s1ocki (slutsky), Sunday, 28 August 2005 21:30 (twenty years ago)

Yes, but what about requiring registration on ILE?
-- pr00de descending a staircase (wor...), August 28th, 2005 3:26 PM. (pr00de)

that's a good example of a protest that worked, without requiring any strike or picket or shutdown.

vahid (vahid), Sunday, 28 August 2005 21:46 (twenty years ago)

i think brg30 is right. i have been working within walking distance of my house for six years now - and i have been at three different jobs. lifestyle decisions.

vahid (vahid), Sunday, 28 August 2005 21:47 (twenty years ago)

another problem w/ protest in "march" / "picket" style is that it the logic often precludes any sort of engagement w/ the other side or any sort of active conflict resolution.

see: the woman from cindy sheehan's camp on CNN who was quoted as saying "basically, we don't want to have a dialogue with anybody who doesn't understand our position" when trying to explain why they wouldn't debate the pro-war campers.

vahid (vahid), Sunday, 28 August 2005 21:51 (twenty years ago)

here's the exact quote:

He and others at "Fort Qualls" have asked for a debate with those at the Crawford Peace House, which is helping Sheehan.

It's unclear if that will happen. But a member of Gold Star Families for Peace, co-founded by Sheehan and made up of relatives of fallen soldiers, said her group would not participate.

"We're asking for a meeting with the president, period," said Michelle DeFord, whose 37-year-old son, Sgt. David W. Johnson, was in the Army National Guard from Oregon when he was killed in Iraq last fall. "We don't want to debate with people who don't understand our point of view."

vahid (vahid), Sunday, 28 August 2005 21:54 (twenty years ago)

(the guy asking for the debate also had a son killed in iraq)

vahid (vahid), Sunday, 28 August 2005 21:54 (twenty years ago)

anyway i don't think ian even neccessarily meant "marching in the streets," i mean the thread title is pretty open-ended. vahid i hope you don't mean ALL forms of protest are "played out"!!

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 29 August 2005 02:33 (twenty years ago)

anyway the idea that even just demos are irrelevant... totally fucking depressing. i don't really think it's true though, i mean maybe in california? but labour demonstrations for instance still get results. and there were huge anti-war rallies in canada before the invasion of iraq, and we ain't there. obv i don't think demos would ever conceivably change bushco's mind but that doesn't mean they don't have any use at all...

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 29 August 2005 02:35 (twenty years ago)

i have lately been wondering if maybe one of the greatest dirty evil tricks the baby boomer generation played on us was glamorizing the "demonstration". i would say compared to tactics like "boycott" and "lawsuit", the "demonstration" is pretty weak.

anyway i sometimes wonder if "protest" on the whole has been blown out of proportion - for example, i think probably the best work the NAACP did towards integration was not necessarily the sit-ins and boycotts and freedom rides, but the years of groundwork in forming powerful allies in the white house (first lady eleanor roosevelt, for example).

i think it's important to remember the demonstrators of the civil rights era, esp since so many of them gave so much (up to and including their lives), but at the same time we tend to forget the coalition-building and legal work and diplomacy that went on behind the scenes (t/s: thurgood marshall vs martin luther king?)

i think maybe today there is too much vocal dissent without constructive activism, too much demonstration but not enough groundwork.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 29 August 2005 03:10 (twenty years ago)

i don't know though, obv i'm just thinking out loud, and i honestly applaud people who demonstrate against the iraq war.

vahid (vahid), Monday, 29 August 2005 03:13 (twenty years ago)

i think there's a danger that people feel perhaps more impotent and powerless than ever. after all, there's 'democracy' if you want to change anything, right. vote that other guy in, with the oh so different policies. and that leads to cynicism and nihilism, but thats what we have, to some extent at least.

you could argue its been a major success of the capitalist elite in 'making' people feel this way (there could have been a danger of people getting really angry if made to feel powerless, yet people sink into cynicism and escape instead, perfect!)

the fact that there is no organized left anymore is also a real problem, single issue politics are all well and good, but not by themselves, not in the long run. they are easily diminished and trivialized (a few hundred thousand hippies)

its hard not to feel this way, look at england! look at the huge protests against iraq war, look at the fact that the majority of the population were against the war, even at the beginning, and how that majority just grew and grew, but it was of no concern to Blair, he didnt even acknowledge the fact. and then there was an election. and he won. none of it mattered.

perhaps its a never ending circle, we tell ourselves protest/demonstration doesnt work, they tell us it doesnt work, it doesnt work, we tell ourselves it doesnt work

voting labour out might have had a bit more resonance though (but the british people would never vote the lib dems in)

BOYCOTT. now, this is more like it. hit 'em where it hurts, and you have a chance! companies are all aware of this, and have their lip service organic ranges, for example. anything where people might boycott a product, they have an alternative lined up. but yea, the chances of people boycotting stuff. nil. back to the same problem, cynicism, or "i agree in priniple, but what difference is little old me going to make, not buying x" aka i cant be bothered

vahids point is good, baby boomers commodification of dissent as neutralizing tool

charltonlido (gareth), Monday, 29 August 2005 05:18 (twenty years ago)

whic leads on to this:

when did actual dissent become uncool, naive, a bit nerdy. like the biggest strawman of them all, 'pc'

charltonlido (gareth), Monday, 29 August 2005 05:19 (twenty years ago)

I'm planning on going to this, anyone else joining?

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 29 August 2005 05:44 (twenty years ago)

I will be in Washington anyway, so very likely yes.

anti-war events in DC, Sept 24-26


I am generally bummed out by the 'preaching to the converted' aspect of all the demos I've attended dating back to the early '80s, but I'm hoping W's 36% poll rating and any lingering Cindy Sheehan Effect might might might make this different.

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 19:55 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.