photo-breezing

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (653 of them)

thanks so much, michael - michaels - that's a really thoughtful post, & some kind of weird historic DSLR is maybe appropriate. a couple of nights ago i found a bunch that i thought at least looked cool but the photos i'd find tagged with the model # on flickr still had this weird digi-gloss i couldn't shake.

i'm not 1000% sure about the camera-computer dynamic thing, just kind of remembering how i use my camera. i know that if i was a printer then printing would be as much what taking photographs was about for me as the taking photographs part. you know? like the people who are invested in that plain of how the images present have this whole other responsibility & perspective. & with a camera so much of the satisfaction for me is still its weird internal processing; i don't really shoot slide film anymore but it feels kinda alchemic, the apparatus having some sort of integrity in re-scrambling together outdoor textures into the emulsion & plastic you feed it. & i don't know, i can't think any further than the camera i'd buy giving me immediately satisfying images, even if they're satisfying in different ways, like i said, flawed or weirdly glowing or whatever. it is cool thinking about this stuff, maybe i will post some cellphone snaps i like sometime.

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Thursday, 15 January 2015 00:11 (nine years ago) link

totally feeling michaellambert's post - I love my RAW/Lightroom workflow for making my architecture photos look as good as I can try and make 'em... but then somehow even quickie snapshots become projects deferred over months in the to-do list. Maybe I should switch to "RAW+Jpeg" so I have the option of just taking what the camera gives me and not fucking around as much. Or look into presets for approximating the camera JPEG, anyway.

Doctor Casino, Sunday, 18 January 2015 18:02 (nine years ago) link

I gave up on RAW+jpeg, all I ended up with was loads of unused jpegs as I couldn't leave the RAW files alone.

michaellambert, Sunday, 18 January 2015 20:37 (nine years ago) link

Well, I’m not an actual photographer and don’t aspire to be one, but I started putting some effort into photography last year to make sure what I posted to Instagram didn’t suck. I had to delete a lot of crappy pictures from my account to get to a place where I was satisifed, to a degree at least, with what I had out there, but: http://shoutkey.com/pageantry

Mostly VSCO Cam + time in the woods and on location at other places, taking a bunch of photos and deleting most of them. I’d like to take more this year and maybe try out some of the other mobile photo software out there too.

(Sorry if this isn’t the right photography thread for this post btw.)

markers, Monday, 19 January 2015 20:00 (nine years ago) link

I really like VSCO Cam.

michaellambert, Monday, 19 January 2015 22:21 (nine years ago) link

Yeah, it makes my stuff look way better.

markers, Tuesday, 20 January 2015 22:11 (nine years ago) link

that photo you posted yesterday was excellent

Hayat Boumkattienne (nakhchivan), Tuesday, 20 January 2015 22:14 (nine years ago) link

Thank you nakh!!

markers, Tuesday, 20 January 2015 22:17 (nine years ago) link

(Lake in my town btw.)

markers, Tuesday, 20 January 2015 22:17 (nine years ago) link

http://internethistory.tumblr.com/post/108858003173

, Friday, 23 January 2015 14:34 (nine years ago) link

ha, my gf's roommate has this

gr8080, Friday, 23 January 2015 14:51 (nine years ago) link

Seems like a bad time to develop some weird ganglion or bone spur on the distal inter-phalangeal joint of my right middle finger. Can barely hold a bloody camera! Obv not mentioning this to folks from whom I'm trying to get photo gigs. Ibuprofen, I guess.

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 09:45 (nine years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/EcqCrF2.png

IH

, Tuesday, 3 February 2015 12:22 (nine years ago) link

schlump i feel you on your reasons for sticking with what you stick with. weird historic DSLR is maybe appropriate. it doesn't feel like a weird historic dslr to me but i have a canon eos 300d, grey plastic, came out in 2003 and i bought it for $50 i think at don's photo in suburban vancouver. you can go to best buy and buy a lens that fits on it and it makes beautiful pictures but the viewscreen is really low res and doesn't show you any flaws but lets you check basic framing and isn't distracting and all controls are on dials and buttons up top and it's easy to use and it doesn't use sd or modern storage (i forget what it uses, some big chip thing) so it slows you down from taking a billion shots on a card and it has okay autofocus so i can use it like i'd use a film point&shoot.

dylannn, Wednesday, 4 February 2015 07:23 (nine years ago) link

from the historic dslr

http://i.imgur.com/ZTCXmOq.jpg

dylannn, Wednesday, 4 February 2015 07:39 (nine years ago) link

it doesn't use sd or modern storage (i forget what it uses, some big chip thing)

Compact Flash. Probably more robust than SD and still used in the pro models, but sadly about twice the price of SD these days (was the other way around 8-9 years ago).

300D was my first DSLR; it was great. This is the last photo I ever took with it, on my daughter's 4th birthday. The shutter mech died minutes later.

https://farm4.staticflickr.com/3614/3289178910_702e20ff56.jpg

Michael Jones, Wednesday, 4 February 2015 11:58 (nine years ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jL0MvHpieaE

Stoked

, Tuesday, 10 February 2015 03:08 (nine years ago) link

dude just straight wiping down that negative huh

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Tuesday, 10 February 2015 03:29 (nine years ago) link

damn

gr8080, Tuesday, 10 February 2015 15:05 (nine years ago) link

oh my god can these negatives please surface please

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2015/02/23/jeb-bush-releases-his-only-wedding-photo-that-wasnt-destroyed-by-a-frank-zappa-concert/

gr8080, Tuesday, 24 February 2015 03:42 (nine years ago) link

lol
imagining a kind of rauschenbergian collage

tender is the late-night daypart (schlump), Tuesday, 24 February 2015 03:47 (nine years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/YhLFLgt.jpg

, Tuesday, 24 February 2015 12:53 (nine years ago) link

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/24/books/tiananmen-square-negatives-an-art-book-or-a-protest.html?_r=0#

I did the invert colors trick and it's cool as heck

, Saturday, 28 February 2015 14:19 (nine years ago) link

http://i.imgur.com/M1VHoTQ.jpg

gr8080, Wednesday, 4 March 2015 14:56 (nine years ago) link

http://barnacleisland.tumblr.com/

Used to follow Talking Barnacles; so nice to follow Tsai again.

drash, Saturday, 7 March 2015 18:46 (nine years ago) link

ILP crew get in here (last 2 days of posts especially):

WE'RE GETTING MARRIED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

gr8080, Monday, 16 March 2015 21:04 (nine years ago) link

photo-cheezin'

Doctor Casino, Tuesday, 17 March 2015 01:16 (nine years ago) link

I've been a long-time (if silent) admirer of that thread, gr8080. Especially as I have three potential wedding shoots lined up and the thing I *never* do (and this is a failing, really) is to get the couple to *do* anything. There's a lot to be said for being an ideas-y, proactive event photographer, rather than the "you won't even know I'm here, in fact most of the time you'll be looking the wrong way" sort of snapper. But some ideas should never be pursued...

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 17 March 2015 11:07 (nine years ago) link

true but weddings & engagement shoots are totally different animals

this is probably very pretentious of me but if i were to get engaged to a like-minded woman i'd try and book someone who shoots large format b&w in a studio with a white canvas backdrop, maybe 12 photos & call it a day

gr8080, Tuesday, 17 March 2015 11:47 (nine years ago) link

if ppl wanna see us looking cute in public they can follow my instagram

gr8080, Tuesday, 17 March 2015 11:48 (nine years ago) link

Ha ha. Gr, if you could fly me in, I would buy the necessary gear and even teach myself how to use it. Polaroid proofs FOC.

True about engagement vs wedding. I didn't even know about the existence of the former until that thread.

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 17 March 2015 12:15 (nine years ago) link

Wedding/lifestyle/engagement photography is so weird - it all looks the same, thanks to VSCO filters and I'm surprised that wedding photographers aren't routinely throwing a shit-fit online about being underbid by bored stay-at-home parents (a big chunk of the wedding biz around here).

Kiarostami bag (milo z), Tuesday, 17 March 2015 18:26 (nine years ago) link

#yes #please

!
really look forward to that

the archive of early 20th c. sydney police photographs, for example, is stunning
the mug shots include some of my favorite portraits ever
the forensic photographs (e.g. of bodies or empty rooms) are chilling, eerie, haunting, fascinating, moving, horrifying, uncanny, yet beautiful (sic— not happy with that word but can’t think of a better offhand)

http://blogs.hht.net.au/cityofshadows/

http://sydneylivingmuseums.com.au/justice-police-museum/forensic-archive

http://collection.hht.net.au/firsthhtpictures/resbyfield.jsp?term=New+South+Wales.+Police+Dept.+&field=AUTHOR&searchtable=CATALOGUE_SEARCH_PICTURES&displayFormat=TABLE

also, enrique metinides

it’s hard to discern/ untangle/ express what some of those crime photographs make one (me) feel, to really accurately describe it. ironically too easy to do some sontagian superego self-scolding critique.

drash, Saturday, 21 March 2015 06:30 (nine years ago) link

e.g. of bodies or empty rooms

or of evidence ("still life") or simply of a place-- a street, a building, hallway, a park (often with no crime specified)

drash, Saturday, 21 March 2015 06:54 (nine years ago) link

Yeah I saw a metinides exhibition @ aperture, stellar work

, Saturday, 21 March 2015 12:15 (nine years ago) link

just came here to post that nytimes link. great pictures there, including evidence of a defunct streetcar line nearby my apartment!

chinavision!, Saturday, 21 March 2015 15:24 (nine years ago) link

https://www.flickr.com/photos/megane_wakui/

IDK how this guy is doing this but I like it

And it's digital!

, Sunday, 22 March 2015 00:05 (nine years ago) link

Nice. Seems to be doing something interesting with the color correction and tonal range, which gives the night shots something of a film feel. Leaning to pink/ blue over green/ yellow? And minimizing contrast, so instead of the harsh blown out highlights you often see in digital photos, there's the mellow glowy lights more redolent of film.

NB I do film not digital and am less than a neophyte at digital post-processing, so don't really know what I'm talking about.

drash, Sunday, 22 March 2015 12:10 (nine years ago) link

its... all the things that I try to correct for when scanning and editing negatives

chinavision!, Sunday, 22 March 2015 15:52 (nine years ago) link

Half film and half video gamey

, Sunday, 22 March 2015 18:55 (nine years ago) link

Elizabeth Huey just posted a bunch of new pics on her tumblr

http://i.imgur.com/p267n4q.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/DteuVpE.jpg

, Wednesday, 25 March 2015 12:05 (nine years ago) link

enjoyed those; good choice imo not to take condescending view of the people in them

they remind me of luigi ghirri, also fascinated with simulacra, juxtaposition of real & represented landscapes, how humans inhabit them

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/blogs/themoment/posts/081105_infocus5.jpg
http://www.theblogazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/20120315-luigi-ghirri-02-2dmblogazine.jpg
http://mycontradiction.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/LuigiGhirriCapri1981.jpg

so then “real” sites & landscapes visited by tourists appear like simulacra, representations, copies of themselves, as well

http://mycontradiction.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/10.jpg
http://mycontradiction.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/luigi_ghirri_foto_02.jpg

drash, Saturday, 28 March 2015 12:36 (nine years ago) link

i went to window of the world a few weeks ago! https://www.flickr.com/photos/kdfo/sets/72157650740712860/

i was aware of the danger of condescension but also wanted to get the chaotic feel of the place...it's kind of hard to avoid ironic juxtaposition completely. but in the case of woow there's really not much room for condescension in that it's really well done. and it's just nice that something like that exists for families who aren't able to travel the world.

rent, Sunday, 29 March 2015 03:31 (nine years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.